“highly significant”

The effect of FD on the frequency of novel phenotypes remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001) even when fitted after the presence/absence of each single genotype, indicating that the observed patterns were not due to a sampling effect (that is, the inclusion of a particular genotype in the community) ( 15 ).

There were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) associations between the abnormal expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin, E-cadherin and β-catenin, Vimentin and β-catenin, SMAD4 and E-cadherin, and a significant association between SMAD4 and Vimentin ( p = 0.0003), and SMAD4 and β-catenin ( p = 0.001) as shown in Table 1 .

At this stringency level, we observed highly significant ( P < 0.0001) correlations between the promoter and ECs for the number of mutations ( R = 0.854) across the 1,492 Kronos mutant lines shared between the two studies ( SI Appendix , Table S2 ).

3b) , which is highly significant for CCL4 (p<0.0001, post test for linear trend).

Highly significant differences (P < 0.0001) were observed in inflorescence length, seed diameter ( Figure 4 ), and hundred-seed weight.

Whereas correlations of PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores with job control at the within-subgroup level (r within ) were highly significant (p < .0001) according to both the R statistic and t-test, such correlations at the between-subgroup level (r between ) were not significant (p>.05). “ S2 Table ” in the supplement/appendix outlines the key indices of within-subgroup variability and interrater agreement in PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores among the same validation population subgroups used to assess factor invariance.

Effect of Gumby genotype on anti-β-gal mean fluorescence intensity was highly significant (H=43.69; p<0.0001).

All neurons in all animals showed a highly significant coefficient of determination between their response on day 1 and day 8 ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.7 to the identity line, Supplementary Fig. 7d ).

Frequency differences in nuclear anomalies between non-apoptotic and apoptotic spermatocytes, as evidenced by SYCP3 distribution, were highly significant (P<0.0001).

Treating cages as replicates, this difference in mating success is highly significant ( t 38 = 5.16, p < 0.0001).

Body conformation indices of pelvic index, body index, transversal pelvic index and weight were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) among the studied districts.

These models established HR and patient age as highly significant (p < 0.0001) predictors of NST.

The overall neutrality test was highly significant for Fu’s Fs (Fs = 14.407, p < 0.0001) and also in CH (Fs = 8.772, p < 0.01), suggesting population expansion or directional selection.

10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001837.supp2 Supplementary data Correlations of anaemia between children and women Despite the fact that the prevalence of anaemia in women was much lower than in children, the prevalence of total anaemia, moderate+severe anaemia and mean haemoglobin concentration between children and women showed a highly significant, strong positive correlation (0.80, 0.76, 0.79, respectively; p<0.0001 for all).

The between subjects results of a repeated measures ANOVA comparing the left and right hemispheric GMV's from FS with gender and D_AEP and their interactions as factors was highly significant for the whole model (F = 11.04, df = 3,22, p = 0.0001) as well as for the interaction between gender and D_AEP (F = 16.41, df = 1,22, p = 0.0005).

The MANOVA performed on the original unscaled variables using 309 complete male skulls with genera and species nested within genera as factors was highly significant (Wilk's Λ = 0.021; df = 39, 252; P < 0.0001) with the single canonical variate (Table 2 ) separating completely the two groups (Figure 1 ).

Paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001 for BLAST and k-mer matching) in accuracy favoring the rRNA operon.

Publication bias and sensitivity analysis Initially, the plausible sources of publication bias were visualized through a funnel plot with Egger test, where the publication bias was found to be highly significant ( P < .0001) (Fig. 5 ).

A Mann-Whitney log rank test was performed, which demonstrated a highly significant difference between the predicted probabilities of the healthy donors, nonirradiated patients, and the irradiated patients ( p < 0.0001).

Likewise, BEAF + and CP/CH + boundaries on chrX show a highly significant difference in insulation between males and females (Wilcoxon test p -value < 10 −4 ) (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 8e ).

Whereas there was no statistically significant sex difference for AChE-R, the difference for AChE-S was highly significant: p < 0.0001 for the main effect of sex and p < 0.0001 for the interaction of sex × region, with the main effect of sex significant both for brainstem ( p < 0.004) and forebrain ( p < 0.0001).

Generally, a p -value less than 0.05 indicates that the corresponding factor is significant. Therefore, the quadratic polynomial model established in this experiment is highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 55 The model’s R 2 is 0.9757, and the adjusted R 2 is 0.9514, indicating a good fit with minimal experimental error.

Jarvinen and colleagues [ 84 ] evaluated topoIIα expression immunohistochemically in 230 breast cancer specimens and found a highly significant correlation with tumour proliferation rate measured by SPF (p < 0.0001).

Specifically, Verticillium ’s abundance in stems from healthy and diseased plants was found to be different, and this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

We found a highly significant increase in synaptic abnormalities in oocytes from BPA-exposed females (16.0% versus 52.0% of cells in placebo and BPA, respectively; χ 2 = 134.8; p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A), largely attributable to increases in two categories of abnormality: “incomplete synapsis,” in which a single chromosome pair remained unsynapsed in an otherwise normal pachytene cell (0.5% in placebo versus 11.0% in BPA; Figure 1 C), and cells with end-to-end associations between nonhomologous SCs (7.7% in placebo versus 25.6% in BPA; Figure 1 D).