“highly significant”

Analysis of these data by Fisher’s exact test showed that protection was statistically significant in each individual study (group 1, p = 0.025; and group 2, p = 0.003), while the combined results were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating the efficacy of Emulsigen as an adjuvant in this system.

At a duration of 12–14 h, elevating pressure increased the fraction of current block by 100 μM PhTX to 48% compared to 29% in control cells, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001; Figures 1C,E ).

An unpaired t-test between PPG-based (mean = 140 ms, SD = 10 ms, n = 116) and our measurement (mean = 98.3 ms, SD = 16.9 ms, n = 18) confirms a highly significant difference between the distributions; t(132) = 16.75, p < 0.0001.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of diabetic status on muscle volume (F(1,34) = 119.04, p < 0.0001), with diabetes accounting for 74.08% of the total variance.

Highly significant factors on the response ( p < 0.0001) were observed with bovine gelatin and sodium alginate.

All the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), describing a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values.

Considering the RI analysis, discrimination between positive and negative samples was highly significant (p<0.0001).

While each inhibitor separately was unable to significantly decrease the rate of tumour growth, their combination induced a highly significant 27% decrease in growth rate ( p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test) (Figure 7A ).

There were no significant differences with gender and there was a weak but highly significant positive correlation with age (Spearman rho = 0.205, p<0.0001).

the ‘non-Euclidean’ analysis) yielded a much stronger and highly significant association (Pearson correlation = 0.878; r 2 = 0.772; P < 0.0001) (Figure 3 d).

Box plots for the results of A , showing highly significant difference ( p <0.0001).

This strategy showed highly significant differences between FM patients and control subjects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, for two separate control populations, respectively).

There were highly significant main effects of YEAR ( LR 3,826 = 182.1, P < 0.0001) and SITE ( LR 3,826 = 76.5, P < 0.0001) and these are summarised in Table 5 .

Expressed as multiples of the 99 th percentile, the TnT concentration was elevated 3.5 fold (interquartile range: 2.2 to 5.2) compared to 0.4 fold for TnI (interquartile range: 0.2 to 0.7; Figure 1C ), which represented a highly significant difference (p<0.0001).

The type of basal medium was also highly significant (F Value = 67; p<0.0001), though much less so than PGR, with more shoots regenerated on MS medium than WPM.

Considering wild-derived and lab-derived strains independently, principal component analyses (PCA, an unsupervised linear feature extraction method that discovers the directions of maximal variances in data) found highly significant correlations between non-synonymous SNP distribution and phylogeny within lab strain V2Rs (Two-way ANOVA, variance by V2R clade F 12,858 = 17.99, P < 0.0001).

A decline in CFU was seen sequentially with increasing passage number ( Figure 4(d) ); comparison of CFU at p1 and p3, p3 and p5, and p1 and p5 was performed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs t - test and the difference was highly significant for each analysis ( p < 0.0001).

The Kendall tau correlation coefficient is 0.905 at a statistically highly significant level ( p < 0.0001).

The MN frequencies were found to increase from Grade I (167.47 ± 10.66) to Grade II (184.6 ± 4.06) and Grade III (196 ± 1.58), the difference being statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001) [ Table 3 ].

The comparison between ChatGPT 3.5's score (45.16%) and the average resident score (76.34%) yielded a highly significant difference, with P < .0001.

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups one month after surgery (p = 0.124), but there were highly significant differences between the groups at two months (66.0 ± 28.7 vs. 40.4 ± 17.5, p < 0.0001), six months (80.0 ± 19.4 vs. 51.0 ± 18.2, p < 0.0001) and 12 months (87.3 ± 16.8 vs. 55.0 ± 33.2, p < 0.005) (Figure 3 A).

5A ) and were highly significant (all p<0.0001, FDR-corrected).

sclerotiorum populations from the four different countries with the R ST fixation index statistic highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for pairwise combinations of England/Norway ( R ST = 0.094), England/Australia ( R ST = 0.186), Scotland/Norway ( R ST = 0.068), Scotland/Australia ( R ST = 0.152), and Norway/Australia ( R ST = 0.198).

The differences in mean antibody response levels between the groups for both net OD 1.0 and OD 1.0 ratio 2 weeks after third vaccination were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test).

The difference between OCHOs and controls in CBFv drop was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 2 ).