“highly significant”

Specifically, the low-dose group showed highly significant differences at both 12 h and 24 h ( p < 0.0001), whereas the high-dose group showed a significant effect at 12 h ( p < 0.0001) and a highly significant effect at 24 h ( p < 0.0001).

Using the comparison of the resulting log-likelihood values from running the model with and without the tree to estimate significance, both replicates produced highly significant (p<0.0001) heritability estimates of 5.8% (CI 2.9–8.7%) and 5.6% (CI 2.6–8.5%; Table 2 ).

Pathway analysis revealed the following highly significant pathways (p < 0.0001): nervous system development, metabolism of proteins, and fragile X syndrome (FXS) ( Table 5 and Supplemental Table 9).

Figure 10 shows that the control group had a glomerular mesangial mean area of 3219.3 μm 2 , while rats with DN had a mean of 5659.7 μm 2 , which is a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001).

4E ; Table 1 ), a difference that was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

However, terms for IL2 in addition to IL2×CSF2 produced highly significant models with coefficient p-values<1e-4.

Detection and assessment domain Within this domain, 24% of competencies (six competences) demonstrated highly significant gaps ( p < 0.0001).

The authors highlighted that the use of IR screening has proven to be reliable in distinguishing between an allergic and an irritant reaction in the diagnosis of contact dermatitis (ACD), given that the difference in average temperature between the two groups was found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001).

5D , statistical analysis confirmed that CAS-FLIER effectively discriminated HIV patients from HC with highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), which was consistent with qRT-PCR ( P < 0.0001).

In addition, GRA35 DNA/mRNA prime–boost regimens resulted in a highly significant reduction in brain cyst numbers ( p < 0.0001) compared with the control group.

State v.11 Fisher’s exact test confirmed a significant association between geminin and nuclear c-Abl ( p-value = 0.0006, Table S1 ), and spearman correlation coefficient test also confirmed the highly significant correlation between expression of geminin and nuclear c-Abl with r = 0.5432 ( p = 0.0001).

Across all groups, age showed a small but significant negative correlation (r = -0.084, p = 0.025) and education showed a highly significant effect with more educated participants being more accurate (F = 12.94, p = 0.0001).

The selected factorial model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), as supported by ANOVA.

Notably, a pronounced and highly significant difference was observed in SEP thresholds (F = 90.39, p < 0.0001, Figure 3(b) ).

S2B) and high ICC of 0.949, indicating highly significant results ( p < 0.0001).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), clearly demonstrating the superior therapeutic effect of Exclzyme Pet in helping the restoration of joint mobility in osteoarthritic dogs. 3.1.4 Willingness to hold contralateral limb The willingness to hold the contralateral limb during a lameness evaluation is a key clinical indicator, offering insight into the severity of pain, compensatory gait alterations, and the degree of joint inflammation.

The correlation coefficient ( r 2) values range from 0.70 to 0.95 (0.70 [for professors], 0.89 [for assistant professors], and 0.95 [for associate professors]); F values are highly significant ( P < .0001) for all faculty subgroups.

By metaphase, statistically highly significant EBV-IS ( p < 0.0001) were located on 13q21 (33 metaphases); 19q13 and 22q12 (16 metaphases); 1p35, 2p23, 2q31, 7p22, and 13p11 (15 metaphases); 3q26 and 7q21 (13 metaphases); 2q21, 4q21, and 4q34 (12 metaphases); 15q14, and 17q25 (11 metaphases); as well as 1q31 and 12q21 (eight metaphases).

The difference in relative expression between cultures with #UFA and #C14 was overall highly significant ( p -value <0.0001).

As shown in Figure 6 , analysis of the core W-box motif (TTGACY) in promoters of these genes by POBO (Materials and Methods) shows that enrichment of this motif is highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001) compared to randomly selected promoters from all Arabidopsis genes.

Regarding age distribution, a significant proportion of individuals in Group 1 were under 25 years old, but this age bracket was not represented in Group 2, leading to a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

Untreated cells (a) showed a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001) compared with all other groups.

Chi-square analysis demonstrated a highly significant deviation from Mendelian proportions (χ2 = 39.25; df = 2; p-value < 0.0001), indicating a marked underrepresentation of homozygous animals at birth.

This linear relationship is further supported by the highly significant PGS × context interaction term ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ).

Two-way ANOVA statistical summary demonstrated that the clinical status had a highly significant impact on these levels (F (1, 36) = 26.59, p < 0.0001).