“highly significant”

score was very strong and highly significant (ρ = 0.874, p < 0.0001).

sham differences were highly significant when tested separately, p < 0.0001; for rhythmic: d = 2.14; for random: d = 1.79).

Figure 10 shows that the control group had a glomerular mesangial mean area of 3219.3 μm 2 , while rats with DN had a mean of 5659.7 μm 2 , which is a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results ( Table 3 ) indicated that this quadratic regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001) [ 59 ].

A highly significant effect of time was observed for SO 2 , Flow, and Velocity (all p < 0.0001), indicating a consistent increase in these parameters following regional anaesthesia.

Tested across all comparisons, this trend was highly significant (one-sided binomial test, p <0.0001) and could be further confirmed using sample permutation analysis ( p = 0.0002).

The association between CT repeatability and the wind parameters (average wind speed, maximum wind speed and wind direction) were generally poor and not significant, with the exception of 2016 ArduCrop where correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and ranged from 0.24 to 0.28.

The likelihood ratio (LR) test was highly significant, χ 2 (21) = 1132.82, p < 0.0001, indicating that the observed correlation matrix differs significantly from the identity matrix and that the data is suitable for factor analysis.

The differences across these groups were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a positive correlation between MIF levels and disease severity.

Dyspnea Two prospective intervention studies 28 , 29 evaluated dyspnea, showing highly significant results between before and after the exercise intervention (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.022, respectively).

Based on 20 independent runs, a paired t-test on accuracy values confirms a highly significant difference (t(19) = 55.37, p < 0.0001), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

The results presented in Table S3 showed that the model was highly significant (F-value = 69.52, p < 0.0001).

Results : When comparing the mean scores before and 2 years after the surgery, a highly significant improvement was found for QoSL and dysmenorrhea ( p < 0.0001).

By applying a paired t test, the differences between the WN and RNN model to the TAtt model were shown to be both highly significant with p ≤ 0.0001 across subjects (Cohen’s d = 10.68 and d = 10.66, respectively).

Clustering by subject was highly significant (P < 0.0001).

Maximum% gain in dentin formation was seen in group I (TheraCal), that is, 16.100 ± 2.42, followed by group II (RMGIC), that is, 11.6000 ± 1.42, and group III (Dycal), that is, 9.6000 ± 0.96, and the difference between group I and group II and group I and group III was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

All quadratic terms were similarly highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with glycerol 2 (F = 197.9) being the strongest factor, followed by peptone 2 (F = 221.5) and pH 2 (F = 181), suggesting a curvilinear parameter–pyocyanin yield relationship in each case.

Finally, the 1 g stim found a highly significant decrease in withdrawal latency for the ipsilateral paw (p<0.0001) ( Figure 3I ).

According to Chi-squared tests in Table 2 and Table 3 , the preference patterns for male and female doctors were all highly significant difference from an equal choice among the various dress styles (p-value<0.0001).

The intracohort differences in the malodor scores compared to baseline were highly significant in both cohorts, with p values < 0.0001.

At 38 days, when the first animal required euthanasia because of tumor size, tumors were 1,764 ± 1,526 mm 3 in the CA9 group and 126 ± 130 mm 3 in the control group ( Figure 5B ); differences in tumor growth were highly significant ( P <0.0001, twoway repeated measure analysis of variance with the Geisser-Greenhouse correction).

This highly significant difference (p<0.0001) indicates that EdU-negative mitotic cells (pH3 positive) had been in G2- or M-phase for at least 24 hours prior to fixation.

Results: Using Pearson’s correlation, tongue thickness was found to be highly significant in correlation with the Cormack-Lehanegrading along with ratio of Pre-E/E-VC thus to predict difficult laryngoscopy with a significant p value of <0.0001.

Using a chi-square test, we found a highly significant difference ( P < .0001), indicating a marked disparity in perception between surgeons and patients.

This study did not show a benefit in OS (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI.0.56–1.08; P = 0.13), but did reveal a highly significant improvement in PFS, with 5 year PFS of 47.6 vs. 31.8% for those given immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40–0.73, P < 0.0001).