“highly significant”

There was a highly significant difference between the coverage distributions at overmerged sites versus the rest of the sites (Kolgomorov–Smirnoff D: 0.5331, p < 0.0001).

For all three emotions, the effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Quantitation of the dispersal of the TGN in SS-RARP2 transfected cells confirmed that the TGN disruption was highly significant (p < .0001) when compared to cells transfected with Iowa-RARP2-GFP, SS-RARP2-C109A-GFP, or EGFP ( S6B Fig ).

In the dentate gyrus (DG), a highly significant interaction was found (F(1,8) = 883.0, p < 0.0001), reflecting a differential upregulation where β-catenin increased more profoundly (mean difference = 53.31%, 95% CI [52.31%–54.31%], Cohen’s d = 106.2) than Wnt7a (mean difference = 38.03%, 95% CI [37.03%–39.03%], Cohen’s d = 99.9).

The Friedman test indicated a highly significant overall reduction in pain scores across these time points (χ2(6) = 104.2, P < 0.0001).

The model is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and demonstrates excellent predictive capability.

Compared with those in the VSV-GFP control group, expressions of ISG15 and 2′-5′ OAS1 in the IFN-ε and MiIFN-ε-inhibited VSV-GFP groups were significantly increased, and the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

In contrast, 135992 and 135993 showed highly significant differences between B-ALL and AML co-cultures (p < 0.0001 for both).

It shows that the major source of variation was the gene factor, and that there was a highly significant interaction between the gene factor on the one hand, and time, TNF or PL on the other hand (P<0.0001), whereas the interaction between the gene factor and RBC appeared to be weaker (P = 0.04).

By 12 months, however, a highly significant ( P <0.0001) increase in input resistance occurred.

The association between attachment of coccoid bacteria to enterocytes and disease status was highly significant in duodenum + jejunum and colon (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively), and was equally present in all parts of the intestine (Fig. 2 b).

The interaction of intervention group and time point was highly significant in a two-way mixed ANOVA model (F(2, 28) = 13.38, p < 0.0001), with significant simple main effects for both intervention group (p = 0.026) and time (p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 c).

This response is well described by a quadratic model (Equation (6)), which was highly significant according to ANOVA ( p < 0.0001, Table S1 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between the amount of BECN1 and PIK3C3 ( Fig. 7D , R = 0.86, p<0.0001) in agreement with their combined role in forming the autophagy inducing PI3K complex.

Specifically, P60/T40-P80/AN20 showed highly significant weight loss compared to P60/T40, P80/T20, and P80/AN20 ( p < 0.0001).

The impact of the respondents' perception of local professional norms regarding disclosure on their attitudes and behaviours was substantially highly significant (p<0.0001) and, importantly, it was independent of local culture.

Bartlett's test of sphericity showed the all-round relation between variables and total sample size to be highly significant ( p > 0.0001**) to proceed towards factor analysis as seen in Table 2 .

For all the intergenic compartments, there is a highly significant enrichment of tags nearby protein-coding regions (Wilcox test, P << 0.0001).

Statistical analysis using a chi-square test confirmed a highly significant association between the leg-feathering phenotype and the genotype of this deletion(χ2 = 60.2, df = 1, p < 0.0001).

In hamsters immunized SQ, body weight plateaued on day 3 such that by day 7, the difference in weight loss between this group and unvaccinated hamsters was also highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

However, when only pCx43 colocalized with PDGFRB was expressed, a highly significant decrease in expression was found, at the level of p < 0.0001 ( Figure 11 ).

The full model incorporating uric acid, CRP, and PPBS further increased predictive accuracy with R2 = 0.790 and was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA results demonstrated that the quadratic model was highly significant (F-value = 152.61, P < 0.0001), with a non-significant lack-of-fit term (F-value = 1.74, P = 0.2971), confirming the model’s adequacy.

A highly significant difference between the knowledge of SRs and nurses was found with a P = 0.0001.

THI showed a highly significant month effect (p < 0.0001), increasing from “no HS” in May (20.4) to “moderate HS” in June (24.8) and “severe HS” in July and August (28.5 and 27.9, respectively).