“highly significant”

The two-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant effect of the culture medium on mycelial growth F (1,44) = 90.128; p < 0.0001.

Equally, there is a highly significant decreasing trend of both types of tumour with UVR-cumulative radiant exposure ( p < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) of pruning wound age, fungal species, and their interaction on lesion development in both experimental years.

Satisfaction and Perceptions of Quality and Patient Safety Course and Implemented Activities A pre–post analysis of 51 students’ responses using the McNemar test revealed a highly significant positive change in their perceptions towards the quality and patient safety course ( p < 0.0001).

Across all folds, the likelihood ratio chi-square test (LR χ 2 ; (df = 5)) yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.0001), with values ranging from 766.26 to 826.37, indicating strong predictive power.

The resulting variance model performed was highly significant: F(15,318) = 14.8742, p < 0.0001, both for the individual explanatory variables and their respective crosses.

In addition, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity produced a highly significant result (χ2 = 10,990.745, df = 3081, p < 0.0001), indicating that the correlation matrix is significantly different from an identity matrix ( Table 1 ).

The most remarkable finding was a highly significant lower in-hospital mortality (56.8 vs. 88.1 %, p < 0.0001) in MET users despite a more explicit risk profile (diabetes, older age) and greater baseline disease severity (higher incidences of cardiovascular disease, acute kidney injury, and underlying malignancy) [ 1 ].

Overall duration of hospitalization was significantly high in fibrinolytic group, this was 17.6± 1.95 days versus 12.09± 2.18 days in open decortication group with highly significant p-value of <0.0001 ( Table-II ).

A highly significant association was observed between mutation type and gene (Chi 2 = 958.8; p < 0.0001).

We found a direct and highly significant correlation (gRVLP: R 2 = 0.794, p < 0.0001; LVLP: R 2 = 0.857, p < 0.0001; egRVLP: R 2 = 0.830, p < 0.0001) between GE efficiencies and Cas9 amounts for each of the three VLP types.

Whereas phagocytosis in the presence of heat-inactivated serum from NHD showed no significant association with LPC concentrations (not shown), a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.556, p < 0.0001) between LPC levels and phagocytosis in case of heat-inactivated serum from patients with SLE was observed (Figure 5 B).

LKES in the third postoperative week showed statistically highly significant improvement ( P = 0.0001). 9 However, in the study by Rudmik et al. 16 where dexamethasone eluting spacer was used, endoscopic evaluation in the fourth postoperative week showed no significant difference on LKES between treatment and control group with an equivalent range of 2–10.

This is highly significant, with t (39) = −11, p < 0.0001.

Tubulointerstitial TG2 showed highly significant positive linear correlations with plasma concentrations of creatinine (r 2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001), urea (r 2 = 0.81, P < 0.0001) and phosphate (r 2 = 0.76, P < 0.0001).

Intervention Outcomes and Group Comparison Overall, the results of our intervention are highly significant (as shown in Table 2 and Table 3 ) with a p -value of <0.0001 for all parameters across both groups.

Firmness was evaluated for the F 1 formula obtained by the classical preparation method compared to that obtained by automatic preparation ( Table IV ), and the significance level of the t test between the two values, demonstrates a highly significant correlation, with a p < 0.0001 ( Figure 4 ).

The difference is highly significant, chi-square test (asymptotic significance, two sided), P <0.0001 ( Table 4 ).

When we summed the numerical equivalents to each attitude question, an overall test showed highly significant positive change ( p < 0.0001) and an average increase in overall scores of 23% ( Table 2 ).

Correlation between all Smads in the ALS samples was highly significant (Fig. 1B ), with Smad1 and 5 being the strongest (Pearson coefficient of 0.88, P < 0.0001).

It corresponds to a decrease of 27.4%, which is highly significant ( t 112 = 11.73; p < 0.0001).

Also, a log–log regression of TD on D is highly significant ( t =–10.63, 38 df, P <0.0001).

The difference in postoperative trismus was highly significant on 1 st and 2 nd postoperative days ( P < 0.0001).

The most insightful factor was the baking process, which resulted in a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) in a w for both ChC and ChLp when baked, with mean differences of 0.09805 and 0.1111, respectively, compared to the chontaduro gel ink.

Statistical analyses of absolute abundance values showed that 17 of the top-30 differential metabolites by importance were significantly upregulated in the CMPLXL group versus the CMPLXH group compared with the MOD group, and 13 of these differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001) in both comparison groups.