Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among treatments ( p < 0.0001), and Tukey’s post hoc test confirmed that the combination exhibited significantly higher inhibition compared to salicylic acid ( p < 0.001) and ibuprofen ( p < 0.001) alone, while ibuprofen was also significantly stronger than salicylic acid ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the already cited study on compliance to SCIT, SLIT, and LNIT in children, data on SLIT concerned 806 patients, 173 of whom (21.4%) were noncompliant, with a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) for a better compliance in hospital setting (90.5%) compared to private office setting (61.2%); the most common reason of withdrawal was the cost of treatment, reported globally in 36.4% of cases, followed by inconvenience, feeling of inefficacy, and side effects ( Pajno et al 2005 ).
Patient's compliance with allergen immunotherapy.
Patient Prefer Adherence · 2008 · PMC2770419
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correspondingly, the present study on the association of the SNP rs13181 with predisposition to Breast cancer showed a significant to highly significant positive association of greater than 2-folds for the rs13181 homozygous mutant (CC) (OR 4.412, 95% CI 2.413 to 8.068, P < 0.0001), heterozygous (AC) (OR 2.086, 95% CI 1.246 to 3.492, P = 0.0056) and combined mutant (AC + CC) (OR 2.672, 95% CI 1.647 to 4.334, P < 0.0001) genotypes.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expressing the survival as CFU/ml instead of as percentages however reveals a highly significant difference between the strains in the actual number of surviving bacteria at 2, 9, and 21 h post-penicillin addition ( P < 0.0001), which again can be explained as a significant strain dependent difference in invasiveness (Figure 5 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Parity ( p -value < 0.0001), menopausal status ( p -value = 0.0001), BMI ( p < 0.0001), and education ( p -value = 0.001) showed the most evident differences (Table 2 ). We found a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) lower vegetable intake among cases (mean 85.24 g/day, SD 50.62) with respect to controls (mean 112.24 g/day, SD 74.49) and a less pronounced, lower fruit intake (mean 262.87 g/day, SD 140.98 vs mean 289.35 g/day, SD 146.28), while no association was found with alcohol intake or total energy intake (Table 2 ).