“highly significant”

After exposure to 10% [6]-Gingerol, the results indicated a highly significant difference between groups (F(3, 8) = 1.01 × 1031, p < 0.0001), indicating that the microbial response to [6]-Gingerol varied significantly by species.

Under cold conditions, the analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype ( p < 0.0001), indicating that Salinas consistently exhibited higher germination than US96UC23 across all time points ( Figure 1 b).

As shown in Fig 2 , plaques formed in the RAP-treated cultures were smaller and less numerous (mean = 199.3, SD = 9.2, n = 54) than those formed in the control wells (mean = 329.1, SD = 6.7, n = 205), with a two-tailed independent t-test revealing this difference to be highly significant (t = 9.290, d.f. = 257, p<0.0001).

The ANOVA results confirm that the model was highly significant, with F = 811.92 and p < 0.0001.

For instance, decreasing the incubation temperature from 37 to 30°C or room temperature, had a highly significant effect on the total aerobic count for samples collected from the low care zone ( p < 0.0001).

Regarding the increase in bitterness and specially astringency observed during wine oxidation are consistent with the highly significant increase in tannin activity (F = 37.53; p < 0.0001) from 2798 ± 577 J mol −1 to 4353 ± 663 J mol −1 .

Tumor-to-blood ratios increased significantly over time for both tracers; however, [ 52 Mn]Mn-BPPA-bevacizumab demonstrated significantly higher ratios from day 2 onward, with the difference becoming highly significant at days 3, 5, 7, and 10 ( p < 0.0001).

All agreement statistics were highly significant (p<0.0001).

Statistical analysis revealed that the reductions in biofilm biomass at concentrations ≥6.25 μg/mL were highly significant (**** p < 0.0001) compared with untreated controls. 2.6.

The baseline pre-injection mean PRTEE score was 72.8 ± 6.97, which decreased to a mean of 40.93 ± 5.94 at two weeks after injection, which was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Its mode of action was clear and highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Supplementary Table S3 ).

Individual p -values, however, were reported for 4 only, deemed highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

SREBQ ‐change in Self‐regulating Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Scores (Level of self‐regulatory eating skills) was highly significant across the study, chi‐square p < 0.0001, with 44% rating low at baseline versus 0% at week 12; 44% rating medium at baseline and vs. 40% at 12 weeks and 12% rating high baseline at baseline vs. 60% at 12 weeks, ( n = 16).

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( Figure 7 ) confirmed that the observed difference in dissolution rate between DIW and sweat was highly significant (Z = −4.50, p < 0.0001).

One-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of incubation time on biofilm formation ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.966).

As shown in Supplementary Table S3 , A (Time) were significant ( p = 0.0018); B (Temperature) and C (Kinds of acid) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

As shown in Table 1 , one-way ANOVA indicated a highly significant main effect of the immunization regimen on antibody titers ( F (3, 36) = 24.68, p < 0.0001).

Two-way mixed ANOVA showed a highly significant Time × Treatment interaction (F (4,95) = 39.77, P < 0.0001), along with significant main effects of Time (F (1,95) = 356.8, P < 0.0001) and Treatment (F (4,95) = 147.1, P < 0.0001).

These two antigen assays showed a highly significant correlation with a Pearson’s r of 0.96 ( p < 0.0001) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

Table S2 shows that the quadratic model was highly significant (F = 224.26, p < 0.0001).

The results revealed a highly significant linear correlation between blood and milk BHB ( p < 0.0001), with an R-square of 0.5419 ( Figure 1 A).

The difference between these values is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Indeed, although a highly significant association was observed between MSI and CD8+ TIL expression (27 MSI CRCs were CD8+ and 34 MSS cases showed CD8 negativity, p = 0.0001), 15 out of 43 MSI tumors (35%) were CD8- (MSI/CD8-) and 12 out of 46 MSS tumors (26%) were CD8+.

When comparing this time span between both study groups we found a highly significant reduction in diagnosis-to-treatment time in the intervention group compared with the control group ( p < 0.0001; Fig. 3 a) with a mean time span of 14 days for the intervention group and 36 days for the control group and with a range between 7 and 81 days.

LKES in the third postoperative week showed statistically highly significant improvement ( P = 0.0001). 9 However, in the study by Rudmik et al. 16 where dexamethasone eluting spacer was used, endoscopic evaluation in the fourth postoperative week showed no significant difference on LKES between treatment and control group with an equivalent range of 2–10.