When examining intra-individual change for the entire sample of participants ( n = 42) that completed the hula program, there was a highly significant outcome on total physical activity ( p < 0.0001), moderate exercise ( p < 0 0.0001), and mild exercise ( p < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Underestimation of FDG uptake in bone was also found on MR/PET due to an under-correction of cortical bone when creating an MR-based attenuation map, although there was a highly significant correlation between the SUVs for MR/PET and PET/CT ( p < 0.0001) ( 45 ).
Highly significant ( P < 0.0001) trends of lower prevalence with increasing sibship size were observed in both age groups for a lifetime history of hay fever and for a lifetime history of eczema, with a less significant ( P < 0.001) trend for asthma ever in the adolescents, but not for asthma ever in the younger age group.
In this full model sample type was highly significant (Pseudo- F = 3.33, df = 1, p = 0.0001), but depth and site were not (depth: Pseudo- F = 2.59, df = 2, p = 0.11; site: Pseudo- F = 0.73, df = 2, p = 0.7) and dispersion differed across all three factors (PERMDISP p < 0.05).
The strongest predictor of adult alcohol problems was whether one felt drunk at first episode and this was highly significant in all analyses, including the multivariable model with the most rigorous adjustment for confounders (regression coefficient: 0.3848, p<0.0001).
We found a highly significant difference between intra- and inter-subject mean durations (Student’s t -test, t (18) = 13.926, p < 0.0001; Fig. 5 B, upper-right inset).
The test for trend across the time points showed that this increase was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
This difference was highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
The treatment difference of 14.1% (95% CI 8.2, 19.2) was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Moreover, the effect of anticoagulation became more pronounced when we analyzed single miRNA ∆Cq levels over time ( Figure 3 B), resulting in a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between CTAD and EDTA plasma for the miRNAs miR-191-5p, miR-320a, miR-126-3p, and miR-21-5p.
The results indicate that Group (ASD and the two TD groups) and Task (with and without objects) as main factors, are highly significant: (Group: F [2,75] 72,55 p<.0001; Task F [1,75] 220,52 p<.0001).
Network and age group showed a highly significant main effect ( p < 0.0001) and a gender main effect was significant at p = 0.05.
While pairing at this locus was abolished throughout the gonad in the hal-2 single mutant, the syp-3; hal-2 double mutant exhibited a highly significant increase in pairing over the hal-2 single mutant specifically in Zone 2 (p<0.0001), the same zone in which chromosome V PCs were shown to be active in the hal-2; syp-2 double mutant.
The lines exhibited highly significant genetic variation for all NIs after rearing on either diet ( p < 10 -4 in all cases; Table 2 ).
A two-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of RVT ( p < 0.0001).
The overall across-population difference in CYP2C8 allele frequencies was highly significant for three polymorphic variants (rs11572080 [* 3 ], rs11572103 [* 2 ], rs10509681 [* 3 ]; p <0.0001).
A number of individual criteria showed highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increases in prevalence between baseline and follow-up, including prescription of PPIs at full therapeutic dosage for >8 weeks (STOPP, 17.2 to 21.9 %).
In particular, the difference between infected animals that received JWH-133 or not was highly significant for endpoints (p < 0.0001) and branch length (p < 0.001).
The correlations between R-values for filaments of different sizes, as well as between gratings of different sizes, were positive and highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
These differences in fibrinogen concentrations among blood groups were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), suggesting blood type may have an influence on fibrinogen levels in COVID-19 patients.
The difference in sequence lengths generated from the two otherwise identical homopoly(U) RNA templates was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The agreement for the category “motives of crime” was highly significant (Cohen’s K was 0.92, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.036–0.101), as it was for the category “contentiousness” (Cohen’s K was 0.90, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.084–0.123) and for the category “overkilling” (Cohen’s K was 0.81, p < 0.0001; 95% CI = − 0.075–0.180) suggesting, according to Viera and Garrett [ 71 ] and to McHugh [ 72 ], a substantial interrater agreement coefficient for all of these variables.
The median overlap was much larger for Stimulus Set 1 than for Stimulus Set 2, and such a difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney U -test test; see Figure 11A ).
In good agreement with these changes in inversion frequencies as estimated from our SNP markers, we found highly significant effects of inversion type (two-way anova , F 5,24 = 21.339, P < 0.0001) and of the inversion type by selection regime interaction ( F 5,24 = 6.9793, P < 0.001) in our data based on inversion frequencies observed from 275 karyotyped larvae, confirming again the reliability of our novel inversion-specific SNP markers.
The table demonstrates that the regression equation model for the mangiferin extraction rate response value is highly significant ( F = 32.88, p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term is not significant ( F = 0.61, p > 0.05).