“highly significant”

Also highly significant elevation ( p < 0.0001) of Cu levels in the lungs was found in non-pregnant exposed (54.4 ± 2.8 μg/L) mice compared to non-pregnant shams (13.0 ± 1.2 μg/L).

All correlations between the FIQR total score and MAU instruments utility scores were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with magnitudes larger than 0.5.

Based on the results, it showed that the model is highly significant when the computed F -value is greater than the tabulated F -value and the probability value is low ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the individual terms in each response model were significant on the interaction effect.

The pathway of flavonoid biosynthesis had the highest rich factor and was very highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001) in the pathway enrichment of continuously upregulated DEGs.

However, when considering the cerebellum as reference region, correlations between DVR-1 based on AV shunt and IDIF were strong and highly significant in all regions ( r = 0.978, p < 0.0001 in striatum; r = 0.967, p < 0.0001 in cortex; r = 0.955, p < 0.0001 in hippocampus; r = 0.934, p < 0.0001 in thalamus) (Figure 2B and Supplementary Table 2 ).

The difference was highly significant with P = 0.0001.

The effect of the factor ‘year’ was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The correlation with MacBlo is highly significant not only for the mean of the three sites ( r = 0.55, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2B ) but also for each of the individual sites ( r = 0.35, P = 0.0001: Hamma Hamma and MacBlo; r = 0.57, P < 0.0001: Lake Washington and MacBlo; r = 0.39, P = 0.0001, Price Lake and MacBlo).

Allelic association tests yielded 93 highly significant SNPs (p < 10 -4 , corrected for permutation tests).

When comparing allelic frequencies between HIV-controllers and the PRIMO seroconverters, four SNPs located within the 6p21 (rs2395029, rs13199524, rs12198173 and rs3093662, are in bold in Table 1 ), showed highly significant differences (p<10 −4 ) that correspond to a striking enrichment in HIV-controllers for protective allelic variants associated with HIV-RNA levels.

Calculating this difference using linear regression, we found the relationship to be highly significant with a p < 0.0001 and a coefficient of 1.79 (corresponding to the difference between 8.4 and 6.6 sleep strategies).

6.65 X 2 X 3 − 35.03 X 1 2 − 47.97 X 2 2 − 29.11 X 3 2 Y 2 (TFC) = 58.85 + 5.13 X 1 + 0.27 X 2 − 1.13 X 3 − 0.43 X 1 X 2 + 0.80 X 1 X 3 − 0.39 X 2 X 3 − 4.51 X 1 2 − 2.53 X 2 2 − 1.71 X 3 2 The results of the analysis of variance in Table 2 suggest that the fitted models for TPC and TFC were both highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack of fit was not significant ( p -values: 0.2161 and 0.3343, respectively), indicating a good fitness for the models.

All associations were highly significant in both sexes, P <0.0001.

Overall, there was a highly significant difference between the methoxyflurane and placebo group (estimated treatment effect, −15.1 mm; 95% CI −19.2 to −11.0; p<0.0001).

Our model selection again identified three kinetically distinct populations of σ2-containing CCPs ( Figure 2 C and 2 D, Tables S1 and S2 ); the preference for three versus two subpopulations was weaker but still highly significant ( p < 10 −4 as compared to p < 10 −10 in LCa-EGFP–expressing cells).

5 , N = 102 patients) revealed highly significant differences in SOZ and non‐SOZ channels ( P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon rank sum) in aggregate and in individual epilepsy patients ( N = 90, P < 0.0001, Sign test).

For the risk level model (Table 3 ), the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the originally measured PROCAM scores and the corresponding predicted risk level values was 0.74, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The lack of a significant interaction between the stress and IMI treatment was observed in the anterodorsal part of the medial amygdaloid nucleus (MeAD) [interaction, F (2, 36) = 1.40; ns], while the treatment factor was highly significant [treatment factor, F (1, 36) = 24.20; p < 0.0001] and the impact of stress was also statistically significant [stress factor, F (2, 36) = 3.75; p < 0.05].

Figure 4e shows the highly significant levels of necrosis in neurons caused by MS A-FT ( p < 0.0001).

There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the values for the two eyes ( R 2 = 0.73, P < 0.0001).

Relationships between in vitro sensitivities to different drugs Pairwise comparison showed that there were highly significant, positive correlations between sensitivities to AS and DHA ( Fig. 2 , P < 0.0001, Spearman's test).

Analysis by R, fitting a GLM with a quasibinomial error structure, confirmed the highly significant main effects of age (change in deviance = 84.45, P < 0.0001, for 6 df) and region (change in deviance = 27.03, P < 0.0001, for 3 df), and the 2-way interaction between age and region (change in deviance = 34.85, P = 0.01, for 18 df, residual degrees of freedom = 1615).

The results shows that when analyzing all lung cancer patients versus healthy controls the diagnostic power of C1M, and VICM individually were highly significant with an AUROC of 0.97 and 0.85, respectively ( P < 0.0001).

The difference between the 2 groups was highly significant ( P < .0001).

There was a highly significant decrease in the mean value in the Aspartame Group ( p <0.0001) as compared with the Control Group, and there was a nonsignificant decrease ( p > 0.05) in the Recovery Group as compared with the Control Group. 4.