Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, Spearman correlation tests between the 25(OH)D concentration values and the absolute and percentage root mean square precision errors (RMSCV and RMSCV%) were performed, showing the highly significant correlation, with r = 0.44 for the absolute root mean square precision error (RMSCV; p < 0.0001) but not for the root mean square precision error expressed in percentages (RMSCV%; r = −0.14; p = 0.08). 4.
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance confirmed that compositional differences among the three associations were highly significant (F = 7.658, p = 0.0001, 9 999 permutations), a result corroborated by the rank-based test of similarity ( R = 0.6135, p = 0.0001).
highly significantp < 1 × 10−40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Across all genomes, ERs were markedly closer in GC content to their host chromosomes than to unrelated chromosomes (median matched GC difference was 3.0%, compared to 10.9% for unmatched pairs), a difference that was highly significant ( p < 1 × 10−4) and associated with a large effect size (Cliff’s δ = −0.63).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The interactions of Wolbachia and elevated CO 2 concentration on total protein, amino acid content, peroxidase activity, and amylase activity were highly significant (two‐way ANOVA, F = 43.979, p < 0.0001; F = 34.696, p < 0.0001; F = 22.865, p < 0.0001; and F = 22.873, p < 0.0001), resulting in increased nutrient content and enzyme activity, which may be beneficial for H. graminicola in future. 4 DISCUSSION Wolbachia , an endosymbiotic bacterium, widespread in insects and Arachnida, have important effects on growth, development, and reproduction.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Substance P cells showed a higher frequency of both sEPSCs and mEPSCs (6.04 ± 0.96 Hz sEPSCs, 3.24 ± 0.67 Hz mEPSCs, n = 27 and 11, respectively) than GRP cells (0.2 ± 0.05 Hz sEPSCs, 0.02 ± 0.01 Hz mEPSCs, n = 120 and 32, respectively), and these differences were both highly significant (sEPSC, Mann–Whitney, U = 68, P < 0.0001; mEPSC, Mann–Whitney, U = 0, P < 0.0001; Fig. 6 ).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation of inter-electrode distance with inter-electrode PLI was very weak in all subjects at all frequency bands (median rho over frequency bands: −0.06<rho<0) with no clear direction, albeit highly significant in single subjects (maximal positive correlation: rho = 0.15, maximal negative correlation: rho = −0.19; p<0.0001) due to the high number of values (214*213/2 data points per subject).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results (a) Comparison of the modes and magnitude of skull shape diversification in Darwin's finches and Hawaiian honeycreepers Morphometric analyses in which the more-inclusive landmark datasets were employed (using the final set of 15 landmarks which allows the extinct Hawaiian honeycreeper species to be analysed) on Darwin's finches, Hawaiian honeycreepers and their respective outgroups, reveal a highly significant degree of allometry ( p < 0.0001), which explains 12.6% of the variation in shape of the skull (electronic supplementary material, table S5).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Relationship between lung neutrophil content and BUN To further examine the relationship between kidney function recovery and lung inflammation, BUN levels were correlated with lung neutrophil percentages (from all AKI experiments) and the correlation was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) with higher levels of BUN correlating with higher levels of lung neutrophils (Fig. 7 , n = 61).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
From this functional enrichment analysis, annotation levels 1 through 3 were derived and summarized in a specific key annotation term for 170 modules ( Table S5 ), i.e., when annotation terms were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and show a similar theme or could be linked to the enriched TF, which was included in further analyses (see following text).