“highly significant”

The analysis of variance also showed that the second order polynomial regression models are highly significant (p value < 0.0001) (Table 5 ).

The slope further increased to 199.8 in the 2010s and 379.3 in the 2020s, both showing highly significant growth rates ( p < 0.0001).

An analysis of the z -transform of these correlations coefficients revealed that the difference was highly significant, t (75) = 8.41, p < 0.0001 (GF items with each other: z = 0.709; GF items with other items: z = 0.237).

Furthermore, a highly significant increase was perceived in CD45 between the PBS and OVA + CFA-treated mice (MFI: 1.94 ± 0.66 vs. 4.06 ± 1.11; p < 0.0001) ( Figure 5 a).

The Likelihood Ratio test was highly significant, indicating significant effect of the covariates on response (p < 0.0001).

Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001) were observed in allele, haplotype, and phenotype distribution across the three Color groups.

This decrease was highly significant [Bl6: F (4.2, 78.9) = 6.82, p < 0.0001; C3H: F (3.9, 137) = 13.0, p < 0.0001].

Here the application of CRMP-5 led to a highly significant increase in the amount of RGCs (p<0.0001).

Change in AXL A highly significant correlation was found between changes in SER and changes in AXL in DISC (r=−0.70, p<0.0001) and SV (r=−0.68, p<0.0001) groups.

Factor Model Analysis According to the ANOVA results presented in Table 5 , the BCF model for As is highly significant (F = 27.74, p < 0.0001).

The age‐grouped time‐to‐maximum values were highly significant ( p < .0001).

However, the mixture of 10 n m CM4620 and 1 m m galactose provided highly significant protection against BA-elicited necrotic cell death ( P < .0001) as compared to cell death levels in the presence of 10 n m CM4620 alone ( Figure 3A ).

Unpaired t-tests comparing the seronegative and seropositive populations yielded highly significant p-values (p<0.0001) for both the Immunetics® C6 Lyme ELISATM ( Fig 2A ) and the MicroB-plex Anti-C6/Anti-pepC10 Immunoassay ( Fig 2B ).

While the correlation between the parameter estimates was highly significant, it was very weak due to the disparity in effect magnitude (R 2 = 0.194; p < 0.0001).

Relationship between Plaque-GSM, IM-GSM and Atherosclerotic Burden Plaque-GSM and IM-GSM correlation was highly significant (r = 0.51; p < 0.0001).

This difference was statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 162.8681, df = 3, P < 0.0001).

Network events resulted in a highly significant positive shift in [Cl − ] i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, n = 75 network events from 16 neurons) and an acidic shift in pH i ( P < 0.0001, t -test, Figures 4A,B ).

In U87 cells, upon RT, GSI and TMZ did not affect the clonogenic survival compared with the vehicle control (DMSO), however the survival fraction was markedly reduced in the GSI + TMZ treatment group at 2,4, and 6 Gy and a highly significant synergistic effect was observed ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 2C ).

The quadratic terms of molar ratio (A), extraction temperature (B), and DES water content (C) were found to have highly significant effects on the response values from Table 7 ( P < 0.0001).

Mixed‐effects ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of time ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,140 = 13.02), no significant effect of the genotype ( ns P = 0.1975, F 1,10 = 1.906), no significant genotype × treatment interaction ( ns P = 0.1926, F 1,10 = 1.952) and highly significant time × genotype × treatment interaction ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,110 = 4.085; Figure 3C,D ).

The OD600 absorbance values for the AYEF+Uracil and ΔlpxM-AYEF+Uracil strains underwent T -test analysis, revealing a highly significant difference (**** P <0.0001, suggesting a statistically significant distinction between the two groups.

2B ), and the difference in the combined numbers of autophagosome and autolysosome vesicles, as an indicator of autophagosome formation, was highly significant ( F (1,23) = 105.52, p < 0.0001, Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig.

When comparing the choice frequency in the two geometrically correct (C, R) versus the two geometrically incorrect corners (N, F) a highly significant difference was apparent (F(1,9) = 61.714 p<0.0001), revealing more choices for the two geometrically correct corners (C,R).

The effect is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and its 95% confidence interval ranges from 0.683 to 0.775.

The clustering observed was found to be highly significant, and we identified 159 unexpectedly large (at least 400 Kb; p<1e-04) clusters of divergent regions with a median size of 800 Kb ( Figure 3 ; Table S2 ).