“highly significant”

The spatial autocorrelation was highly significant (p-values: Obsoletus group model: p<0.0001, Pulicaris group model: p<0.0001), and was estimated to be 0.41 (+/-0.09) for the Obsoletus group model and 0.235 (+/-0.09) for the Pulicaris group model for traps placed with 50 m distance.

The F-value derived from the F-test, amounting to 47.68, signifies a highly significant model (*** P < 0.0001).

Therefore, iodized salt intake appeared to be related to a highly significant reduction in the incidence of thyroid nodules ( P < 0.0001 in a chi-squared analysis).

We also calculated the ICC for the general public networks and found that all variables of interest had a highly significant intraclass correlation (CC Number: ICC = 0.10, F (274,1918) = 1.93; P < .0001; CC Mean Size: ICC = 0.07, F (274,1918) = 1.57; P < .0001; CC Median Size: ICC = 0.12, F (274,1918) = 2.05, P < .0001).

Here the application of CRMP-5 led to a highly significant increase in the amount of RGCs (p<0.0001).

On the first day after PCI, highly significant associations were found of ASAT with IL-6 and neutrophil count (both: r>0.75, p<0.0001), and of CgA with neutrophil count and monocyte count (both: r>0.79, p<0.0001); furthermore, cortisol was also associated with neutrophil count (r>0.7, p<0.0001).

There were no significant differences within the states with the exception of HDL cholesterol where differences were highly significant at p = 0.0001, Table 2 .

These improvements were further supported by statistical comparison using DeLong’s test, which confirmed that the observed differences in AUC were highly significant (all p values < 0.0001).

In our study there was a highly significant difference in METS of sedentary and non-sedentary individuals ( P < 0.0001).

conventional FA concentrations in 2 tables, about 2 findings of P = 0.05 and 0.5 finding of P = 0.01 can be expected there by chance alone, but our key findings are highly significant ( P <0.0001) and not vulnerable to Type-I errors (incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis).

Furthermore, Tukey’s post hoc test confirmed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between these groups.

Regression analyses of all data collected from 2006–2009 for swarming start times (Figure 5 A&B) and end times (Figure 5 C&D) on the concurrent times of local sunset found a highly significant correlation between swarm times and sunset for both species (p < 0.0001, Table 1 ).

This contrasts sharply with the highly significant differences noted in spleen size and splenocyte number ( P < 0.0001) of sTg MTAG mice compared with the wild-type controls.

5 E) levels in the tumor tissues of the PAC treatment group compared to the control group, with both lipid peroxidation and Fe 2+ levels exhibiting an increase of over 10 times that of the control group, indicating a highly significant statistical distinction between the two groups (p < 0.0001).

Arsenic and Hg exhibited highly significant spatial variation ( p < 0.0001 for both), with the highest concentrations observed at location L2 (As: 4.56 μg/g; Hg: 0.64 μg/g) and the lowest at L6 and L4, respectively.

Results Axial length Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between the type of defocus and time of measurement for axial length measures across the six defocus conditions (F (20,300) = 4.60, p < 0.0001).

The Friedman test was highly significant for Information Extraction (Canal Course) ( χ 2 (3) = 61.09, p < 0.0001), with a large effect size ( W = 0.68).

More than 60% of the genes identified as differentially expressed in the first experiment were replicated in the second set of arrays, and we found a highly significant concordance in fold-change estimates for gene expression variation between the two experiments ( ρ = 0.81; P < 0.0001).

Young women (15–19 years) were the most susceptible, with an RR of 2.06 (95% CI: 1.92–2.21), highly significant ( p < 0.0001); this RR was 2.5 after 1 month of HBC use, remained above 2 during the first year, and was 30% higher after 7 years.

Statistical analysis Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among ranks ( p <0.0001), in terms of the number of genes coding for TFs, as depicted in Additional file 10 .

pylori infection score was higher in FD than NERD and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

In contrast, cells expressing E2814-CAR exhibited highly significant differences ( F (7, 16) = 127.2703, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.9824; Table 3b).

Split-plot ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of contrast (F 2,52 = 37.19; p < .0001) and interaction between group and contrast (F 2,52 = 8.07; p < .001); the main effect of group was not significant (F 1,26 = 0.22; p = .64).

The results remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by linear regression).

Highly significant differences ( P <0.0001) were observed in allele, haplotype, and phenotype distribution across the three Color groups.