“highly significant”

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was highly significant for six variables: step time (p = 0.0001), single-support phase (p = 0.0001), walking speed and cadence (p = 0.0227), CoM (p = 0.0117), and GSR (p = 0.0001).

Cook [ 48 ] summarized the results of an additional 11 family-based studies in a meta analysis and concluded that the association between the DAT gene and ADHD was highly significant (p < .0001).

24.46%, p < 0.0001), and there was a highly significant reduction in the post- compared to the pre-implementation group in the number who received a post-procedure prophylaxis (16.7% vs. 1.2%, p < 0.0001).

At 0.50× and 0.75× MIC the effects were uniformly highly significant for all isolates and both combinations (mostly p < 0.0001).

The value of glcH expression observed at 5 nM glucose was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Although statistically highly significant (P < 0.0001), this difference is small since only a proportion of SNPs were tested with the SNP panels.

Moreover, comparing pre-intervention assessment to 12 month (during treatment) assessment yielded that the improvement in all of the assessed indices was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for Visual Acuity, BUT, and Schirmer test for both eyes.

Likewise, at least comparable fold improvements are seen in PFRM over BCRAT lifetime risk estimates between 2.6 and 2.8 at risk threshold of ≥ 20 and 25%, respectively, and these are also highly significant (p < 0.0001).

While comparing between two groups a statistically highly significant difference found between the groups ( P < 0.0001) and group C maintains hemodynamics more steadily than group G.

Significant increment was shown at 8.5 minutes of exercise in volunteers and patients in group A, but not in group C. Change-in-angle scores There was a highly significant effect of exercise stage on the change-in-angle scores (p-value < 0.0001) adjusting for groups; mean change in angle scores at 2.5 min, 5.5 min and 8.5 min were 44.9, 63.8 and 79.0, respectively.

Consistent with the higher protective efficacy seen with antigen combinations compared to individual antigens, Com1/4, Com2/3 and Com1/2/3/4, all induced highly significant IFN-γ ELIspot responses with both immunisation regimens ( p < 0.0001–0.05).

Statistical analysis (ANOVA) indicated a highly significant reduction in pain severity ( P < 0.0001) and related symptoms ( P < 0.0001) evaluated by Michigan Neuropathy Screening instrument, Total Symptom Score, and Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory.

Consistent with our previous reports, while Pter treatment alone led to decreased angiogenesis in tissues (CD31 staining), combination treatment showed highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in vessel formation and secretion of VEGF‐c and IL‐1 β levels in serum compared to all other groups.

Therefore, in group A, in the beginning of the treatment, more improvements in hearing were observed (χ 2 = 0.819, p = 0.66) in comparison with group B ( Table 2 ). Both groups showed highly significant improvements in hearing level in the first week post-treatment hearing assessment ( p < 0.0001 for both groups) ( Table 3 ).

We found no effect of HA condition ( F 2,18 = 2.9, P = 0.83), whereas the effect of the number of sound sources was highly significant ( F 4,36 = 54.5, P < 0.0001).

The t -test applied for ABIM versus NIM and ABMA versus NMA yielded highly significant result with P < 0.0001*.

Turkish studies consistently confirmed the association of ARMS2 A69S variant with AMD risk, with odds ratios ranging from 3.0 to 8.56 (95% CI: 1.23–20.83) and p values ≤ 0.008, including highly significant results (p < 0.0001).

The combination of IMAR and DEMAR resulted in a highly significant artefact reduction than IMAR alone (p<0.0001).

coli also remains highly significant (OR = 1.79, p < 0.0001), underscoring persistent concerns regarding microbial contamination in drinking water.

There was a highly significant difference (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P<.0001) between the CDF for orientation 0° and those for either 90° or 180° orientation.

A separate analysis of the two age groups showed that the decrease in arousal level was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in the youngest group, and non-significant in the older group.

They demonstrated that the mean increase in total serum iron following iron sucrose was 40.20 ± 5.11 μg/dL compared to an increase of 33.56 ± 3.39 μg/dL with oral ferrous sulfate, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The highly significant results obtained for the primary comparisons ( P < 0.0001 for all key flow metrics) suggest adequate statistical power for the main study endpoints.

Regression analysis showed that shortness of breath was a highly significant ( P <0.0001) predictor of impact items.

All histologic parameters showed highly significant changes (each p<0.0001) 31 days postoperatively, except the irritation of the lamina elastica interna (p = 0.22).