“highly significant”

There was a statistically highly significant difference seen for the VAS score between sites at Site A1, Site A2, Site B1, and Site B2 at baseline (p = 0.000), one hour (p = 0.000), and two weeks (p = 0.000).

A highly significant difference (Figure 9a ) was measured between postprandial blood sugar levels after consuming both control and intervention recipes ( p = .000).

Overall mean knowledge score gain of security officers regarding COVID19 infection was from 6.69 ± 1.27 to 8.38 ± 1.35, which was highly significant ( P = 0.000).

Similarly, Student’s t-test showed a highly significant difference between the two groups for scores on the two TMT tasks A and B and the time difference between the two tasks [(t=2.4, p<0.000) for task A; (t=3.8, p<0.000) for task B, and (t=3.8, p<0.000) for the time difference between the two tasks, respectively].

On the other hand, the isolated effects of the product factor were highly significant, with p = 0.0000 for g s , p = 0.0009 for C i , and p = 0.0031 for E .

The degree of repeatability in follicular diameters in consecutive cycles was highly significant for both halves of the season (p < 0.000), r = 0.97 and r = 0.98 for first and second halves.

The difference between the experimental and control groups with respect to these measurements was statistically highly significant at 3 months ( P = 0.00) but not significant at 6 months ( P = 0.45) [ Table 1 ].

The association between MRE timing and the final diagnosis was highly significant (χ2=27.3, p-value=0).

The p-values of these three models are highly significant P = 0.000 and the application conditions are met (normality of residuals, homoscedasticity of residuals and absence of multicollinearity).

The student’s knowledge and awareness on cancer education scores were highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Correlation Analyses between Scores of Complaining of Dry Eye and Ocular Surface Analysis Indicators A highly significant inverse correlation was observed between the value of OSDI and NIBUT (rs = −0.982, P = 0.000) ( Figure 1 ).

There was a highly significant correlation between the GBS grade and the presence and size of varices only when associated with high OV metric score (Pearson’s chi-square t -value =53.85, p =0.000), as shown in Figure 4 .

Adjustment for baseline smoking There is a highly significant correlation (r = 0.95, p < 0.000 for males and r = 0.85, p < 0.000 for females) between the standardised residuals (school effects) for Model 1 when baseline smoking is adjusted for and when it is not (This is further illustrated by comparing Figure 3B and Figure 3C ).

A Chi squared test yielded a highly significant result, p = 0.000, but Cramér’s V = 0.109 indicates only a weak relationship between gender and the number of employer changes.

Mean reduction in the CPIS Scores between both the groups was highly significant ( P = 0.000) as compared to the baseline CPIS Score [ Table 3 ].

Our logistic regression model was significantly better as it explained more of the variance in the outcome, which was reflected by the highly significant chi-square value (chi-square = 2365.3, df = 17, p < .000).

The cells of the clonal line showed a highly significant suppression to NK sensitivity, P < 0 - 0 1.

In addition, Spearman's rank correlation test showed a highly significant correlation between estradiol and progesterone with LH in all women ( r = 0.20, P = 0.000; r = 0.18, P = 0.000, respectively).

On follow up, raised mean MVD was seen in those cases with relapse/deceased as compared to disease-free patients, which was highly significant (p = 0.000).

On the correlation of MMP-9 expression with histological grades of OSCC, we observed MMP-9 expression gradually increased as the tumor progressed from Grade I to Grade II to Grade III and was also found to be statistically highly significant ( P = 0.00) [ Table 6 ].

The dimensional stability of the mesiodistal papilla assessed in both the groups exhibited highly significant differences ( P = 0.000) over time, whereas the texture and color of peri-implant soft tissues did not change significantly in either group and showed insignificant changes over the follow-up period.

The developed model is highly significant ( P = 0.000) and acceptable, showing that pH was the highest significant factor influencing the bioprocess.

The correlation was highly significant (Cramer’s V 0.542, p = 0.000).

The test of Sphericity was highly significant with χ2 = 193.8970 and p < 0.000.

Reproduction and population growth parameters The effect of temperature was highly significant for the different reproductive parameters including gross ( F = 11.41; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 14.405; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fecundity rates, gross ( F = 15.82; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and net ( F = 17.51; df = 4; P value = 0.00) fertility rates, mean eggs per day ( F = 10.66; df = 4; P value = 0.00) and mean fertile eggs per day ( F = 13.15; df = 4; P value = 0.00) ( Table 1 ).