The statistical analysis of the data using an ANOVA test indicated a highly significant difference (P < 0.000) in compressive strength values among the tested groups, as depicted in Table 3 .
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The developed model is highly significant ( P = 0.000) and acceptable, showing that pH was the highest significant factor influencing the bioprocess.
However, 3–5 days after surgery, pair-wise comparison of proportions revealed a highly significant effect of ION severing on the percentage of nose insertion into the slot ( P = 0.000; n = 12 sessions with 318 trials).
Contrastingly, a study found that the mean knowledge scores of dental and pharmacy students were 114.375 ± 26.386 and 48 ± 30.0856, respectively, with a highly significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.000) [ 38 ].
The relationship between socioeconomic status and screening utilization was highly significant (χ2 = 139.2, p < 0.000), with a concentration index of 0.125 confirming substantial pro-rich inequality in service access.
Highly significant ( P <0.000 2) genetic variance was expectedly observed among the populations and explained 63.27% of the total variance, supporting the results from the hierarchical and Bayesian clustering.
It turns out the MADa and DSIM are relatively small and highly significant (p = 0.000) with a linear correlation approximately 0.8.
Compared to the control level, highly significant ( p value = 0.000) increases in the germination percentage of Zea mays were found in the following descending order: U. fasciata. polysacch. 5 mg/mL > U. fasciata. polysacch. 10 mg/mL > U. lactuca. polysacch., 5 mg/mL > U. lactuca. polysacch., 10 mg/mL priming solution agent.
The between-group differences in coefficient variation are also highly significant (SS = 0.018, df = 1, MS = 0.018, F = 61.490, p = 0.000, η 2 = 0.400), whereas the within-group differences are relatively smaller (SS = 0.027, df = 94, MS = 0.000).
Because the investigated variables were not normally distributed (all p -values were highly significant using the Shapiro–Wilk test: study duration ( p < 0.000), study phases ( p < 0.000)), we employed correlation analysis according to Spearman.
en that academic success is related to the teacher's pedagogical skills and the student's motivation to assimilate new knowledge. 19 According to Table 2 , the results suggest that in comparing frequencies of the levels of perception of success pedagogy for the feedback dimension, there are highly significant differences (p = 0.000, <0.05). 85% of undergraduate students scored in the high level for feedback, while 53.3% of postgraduate university students scored in the medium level.
A highly significant correlation ( Figure 6 A, Spearman Rho = 0.68, P ≈ 0) was obtained between observed and expected values, suggesting that, in general, TEs tend to insert randomly in the genome.
A highly significant increase in GMFM-88 scores was observed after 24 months of treatment compared to baseline when all children were evaluated together (n = 35; p = 0.000).
The correlation between the two SIPRe samples (junior and expert therapists) was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.936; p<000).
Safe cord-cutting practices were found to be more predominant among 213 (74.7%) semi-skilled laborers than 45 (21.1%) skilled laborers, and it was highly significant ( p = 0.000) statistically.
ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of cement content on UCS ( p = 0.000), confirming that strength development is strongly dependent on binder proportion.
Additionally, a highly significant difference ( P = 0.0000) was noted between Chimer_Tv and Chimer_PanTryp-1 ( Figure 6 ).
The results showed that equation is highly significant (Prob> χ 2 , p = 0.000).
We found a highly significant effect of CSI [ F (1, 688) = 37.5, p = 0].
On comparison between 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 1 and 3 using post hoc test, highly significant difference ( P =0.000) was observed on 0 day.
aureus show that the presence of these genes in D30, D20, D39 and D85 is highly significant (P-value = 0.0 after Bonferroni correction).
CMT CMT showed no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups throughout the follow-up period (P-value= 0.276, 0.354, and 0.464 at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months respectively) ( Table 5 ). The change of CMT ( Table 6 ) was highly significant in the 3 groups (P-value= 0, 0.001, and 0 in groups I, II, and III respectively) throughout the follow-up period ( Figures 5 , 6 and 7 ).
In our study, 45.5% of the cases were 6 to12 years and there was highly significant association between age and sex and prevalence of epilepsy (p=0.000).
This difference was highly significant (X 2 =24.85, N=47 P<0.0000).
Frequency of persistent pale stool between BA and non- BA were 88 vs 8 (83.0 % Vs 21.0 %) which was highly significant (p=0.000).