“highly significant”

The results demonstrated that the fold change of the upregulation and downregulation of the 10 selected DEGs was basically the same using two different detection methods, and the correlation coefficient of the two reached 0.988 (R 2 = 0.975), which was highly significant ( p < 0.000).

Discriminant Analysis All trace and macro element concentrations included in the discriminant function analysis were highly significant in discriminating between the cruises (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.149; F = 47.30; p < 0.000; Table 4 ).

The results from the Mann–Whitney test indicated highly significant statistical differences ( p = 0.00000, α = 0.05) between the analyzed variables, which were also supported by a very high effect size (r = 82%).

Post hoc Tukey's HSD test showed that the difference in mean pH values between aqueous Stevia extract and sucrose and Stevia product and sucrose was highly significant ( P < 0.000).

All correlations are highly significant (all P <0.000).

The difference in dN/dS is highly significant (permutation test P =0 after 10 9 iterations; Supplementary file 1B ).

Another highly significant finding involves the association between stress-related eating behaviors and depression-related eating urges [ χ 2 =50.515, df = 2, P = 0.000], which is shown in the results as the vast majority [89.9%] of respondents who do not eat when stressed reported no urge to eat more when feeling down.

There are four parameters: shoot height, root height, fresh weight, and total chlorophyll content, which were highly significant ( p < 0.00 ) and leaf length, width, and area demonstrated a trend toward significance.

Cause of death and macroscopic aspect of sera influenced the serological results in a highly significant manner ( P = 0.00).

The p -values associated with these differences were highly significant, with miR-17 ( p = 0.000), miR-191 ( p = 0.0001), let-7e ( p = 0.0001), and miR-33a ( p = 0.003).

But in the case, DSG3 marker detection, an almost perfect agreement between both the observers, was seen with an ICC value of 0.921 and it is highly significant with a P value = 0.000.

Highly significant differences in favor of MEBO group were observed in the case of medical visits (€4.28 versus €5.67, p = 0.00) hospitalization costs (418.48 versus 496.25, p = 0.01) and costs of analgesics (€0.10 versus €0.18 p = 0.00).

Interestingly, the percentage of GC in the Paenibacillus genomes were found to have a loose, but highly significant, linear correlation with the number of genes per Kbp of genome size, as well as with the total genome size and total gene count in the genome ( p = 0.000; R 2 = 0.258; S1B and S1C Fig ).

Local-bed system For 2003, the model of the local-bed system was highly significant at a χ 2 109.641, df = 9 (p < .000), and explained between15.0% (Cox and Snell R Square) and 23.5% (Nagelkerke R Square) of the variance.

CEPs were found almost twice as frequently in the mandibular molars as in the maxillary molar, which was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.000) [ Table 1 ].

( 29 ) altered the result from non-significant ( P = 0.34) to highly significant ( P = 0.000). 3.10 Quality assessment The quality of evidence for the incidence of PONV was rated as high.

The increase in number of high affnity binding sites was highly significant by constrained parameter (51) curve fitting (F = 160.83, df = 31, P = 0).

In the GDP model, this variable has a strong positive and highly significant coefficient ( β = 0.447, p = 0.000), indicating that greater participation in online courses among people aged 55–74is associated with higher GDP per capita.

These reductions were highly significant (p<0.00).

There was a highly significant difference between the prolongations of PT and PTT in DF ( P < 0.000).

An important finding from this study is the highly significant concordance between the status of MGMT methylation and its in situ protein expression by IHC (63% MGMT hypermethylation v/s 60% loss of MGMT protein; p = 0.000).

A Chi squared test yielded a highly significant result, p = 0.000, but Cramér’s V = 0.109 indicates only a weak relationship between gender and the number of employer changes.

Concerning the quantitative evaluation of new bone formation in the CSD, treatment either by PRF either alone (PRF group) or in combination with ZnONPs (PRF/ZnONPs group) revealed a highly significant ( P = 0.000) increase in the percent of CSD filling rate versus the control group (Fig. 2 ).

The mean cord blood prolactin of neonates was 288.04± 92.46 ng/ml, and it also showed highly significant differences between the groups being higher in neonates of gestational hypertension group ( P = 0.000) ( Table-I ).

One author suggests that if the result is highly significant, P value should not be written as “P = 0.000” but presented as “P < 0.001.”[ 7 ] For any range, it is better to avoid using the dash “-” as it may be misinterpreted as a negative sign; instead, it should be presented as “between and,” for example, BMI ranged between 25.1 and 34.9 kg/m 2 . 6 Tables and figures are the cornerstones of the result.