“highly significant”

The duration of outdoor exposure had a highly significant effect on the amount of moisture lost by both hydrogel types (ANOVA, df = 14, F = 123.2, P < 0.0001).

Likewise, biofilm amount of each strain did not change significantly during assay ( P > 0.05), whereas highly significant ( P < 0.0001) differences in biofilm biomass were found among the assayed strains.

The difference between groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4 a).

The ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect (F = 11.54; p < 0.0001), with an R 2 value of 0.4903, indicating that almost 50% of the observed variability is explained by the model.

focused attention was highly significant for the high performing older adults (t(10)=6.78, p<0.0001) but only trended towards significance for the low performers (t(10)=2.05, p=0.07).

Interestingly, changing the screw configuration resulted in highly significant changes in product temperature ( p < 0.0001) and in a less significant yet visible trend on SME (0.1 > p > 0.05).

MyHC and MEF2C protein expression levels gradually increased along with differentiation, the relative quantitative analysis of the proteins was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Figure 2 C,D) and consistent with their mRNA results.

IL-19 and beta-defensin expression were also strongly correlated with each other ( r = 0.81) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001), suggesting that both biomarkers are involved in the same pathway of psoriasis pathogenesis.

Overall, there was a highly significant difference in RR between the group of MB-stained patients and those without ( p < 0.0001), even if analyzed separately for treatments.

Correlations between PCA derived indices and traditional indices was highly significant: r = 0.954 P < 0.0001 and r = 0.963 P < 0.0001 , for production and quality indices of all 861 selection candidates ( Figs. 4b and 5 ).

There was a highly significant difference in the conspicuity between malignant and benign lesions ( P < 0.0001).

Quantification of GS-IB4 and CD31 CNV area demonstrated a highly significant reduction in the median lesion area of 45.6 [27.1–59.4]% ( p = 0.0001) and 45.1 [24.3–60.2]% ( p = 0.0006), respectively, in 13-12AB-PEDF-injected eyes compared with S1-S2AB-AsRed-injected control eyes ( Figures 5 B–5D).

In all cases, there were highly significant correlations (Linear regressions; whole period: r 2 = 0.292, F 1,453 = 188.1, P < 0.0001; 2015: r 2 = 0.252, F 1,157 = 54.3, P < 0.0001; 2016: r 2 = 0.377, F 1,134 = 82.6, P < 0.0001; 2017: r 2 = 0.343, F 1,158 = 84.0, P < 0.0001; SI Appendix , Fig.

Results indicated a highly significant main effect of time, F = 96.20, P<0.0001.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with a coefficient of determination R 2 = 0.99 and an adjusted R 2 = 0.98, indicating that the model accurately explains the variability in the response.

We found that there was a strong, highly significant correlation (rs = −0.95, p<0.0001) between readthrough level and the decrease in luciferase activity.

Considering the RI analysis, discrimination between positive and negative samples was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Highly significant correlations with the fractional absorptions were found between FePP and ASP-p ( r = 0.92, P < 0.0001) in study I and FeSO 4 and ASP-p ( r = 0.52, P < 0.02) in study II ( Figure 4C ).

This represents a highly significant difference in cell cycle progression ( P < .0001 by χ 2 analysis).

When all daily blood pressure observations were combined, the mean reductions were highly significant: P < .0001 for systolic and P > .0004 for diastolic blood pressure reductions over the 11-week period ( Figure 2 ).

3E ) mean Go waveforms ranged between 0.91 and 0.99 for the displayed sites; all were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), confirming their good approximation.

Remarkably, MV2C, the histotype of which is virtually indistinguishable from that of MM2C, showed a large predominance of the 129 M allotype, with resPrP D -129 M accounting for 83 ± 7% of total resPrP D , a difference between populations of resPrP D -129 M and -129 V statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Under Eligibility Criteria, inclusion criteria were reported in 80% of public summaries and 100% of GAI summaries ( p = 0.11), whereas exclusion criteria were completely absent in the public summaries (0%) but present in all GAI-generated ones (100%), representing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, the percentage of positive fields for IL-13Rα2 expression in 2+ and 3+ positive specimens in IHC analysis demonstrated a highly significant trend in these specimens (well differentiated = 35.0%, moderately differentiated = 82.0% and poorly differentiated = 94%; exact p < 0.0001) compared to PDAC samples with negative values of IL-13Rα2 (≤ 1+) ( Figure 1 D).

We found not only a highly significant difference between the two groups (p ****<0.0001; Fig. 2 I) but also an excellent receiver operating characteristic (AUROC 0.9955; 95% CI [0.9854–1.000]; ****p < 0.0001; Fig. 2 J). 3.2.