Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A 3 × 3 within participants ANOVA of list type and the serial position of the critical word, revealed a highly significant main effect of list type: F (2, 106) = 20.458, MSe = 0.008235, p < 0.0001, highly significant main effect of critical word serial position: F (2, 106) = 23.926, MSe = 0.006552, p < 0.0001, and most importantly, a highly significant interaction between the two factors: F (4, 212) = 5.880, MSe = 0.005438, p < 0.0001.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, when the fertilization rates were adjusted for the mature oocytes (metaphase-II oocytes), there was a highly significant difference in fertilization rates in favour of the group with SDF levels < 15% where the women were in the younger age grouping of <35 years (78.4% vs. 73.0%; p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis revealed that the differences in prevalence between the two time periods were highly significant for all three allergens: thiuram mix ( χ 2 = 1382.26, p < 0.0001), mercapto mix ( χ 2 = 179.58, p < 0.0001), and mercaptobenzothiazole ( χ 2 = 317.21, p < 0.0001). 3.2.4.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The interaction of both variables (time × cement) was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for time × cement, two‐way repeated measures ANOVA for gentamicin and vancomycin, respectively) indicating significant differences in the release kinetics of the cements over time.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A significant increase of several amino acids including phenylalanine (Phe, p < 0.01), tryptophan (Trp, p < 0.001), and tyrosine (Tyr, p < 0.0001), as well as isoleucine (Ile, p < 0.05), glutamate (Glu, p < 0.05), glutamine (Gln, p < 0.05), and glycine (Gly, p < 0.05) was observed, whereas a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease in cysteine (Cys) was measured.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The levels of eight cytokines showed a highly significant correlation with the degree of small bowel mucosa damage according to the Marsh classification: IL-27 ( r = 0.46; P < 0.0001), sIL-2Ra ( r = 0.41; P = 0.0005), IL-15 ( r = 0.40; P = 0.0005), IL-8 ( r = 0.40; P = 0.0004), IL-5 ( r = 0.30; P = 0.01), IP-10 (IFN γ inducible protein 10 or CXCL10) ( r = 0.27; P = 0.02), sTNFRII ( r = 0.26; P = 0.03), and MIP-1 β ( r = 0.25; P = 0.03).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although interfamily variation was highly significant at both temperatures (all P < 0.0001, Table 2 ), the amount of variation at 7°C appeared to be greater overall than at 14°C (average range in time to hatching = 2.4 days at 14°C vs. 6.3 days at 7°C; stage at hatching = 0.87 vs. 1.6; size at hatching = 0.77 vs. 1.04).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regressions of environmental suitability index versus latitude were highly significant (Fig. 4 ) but with low predictive power (Fig. 4 ) by a low R -value (“black” form: R 2 = 0.0004, P < 0.0001, intercept = 0.54; “red” form: R 2 = 0.002, P < 0.0001, intercept = 0.66).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For example, the mean serum creatinine level fluctuates around 95 μmol/l throughout the whole study period, but there is a slight positive (ie, upward) linear trend for males above 75 years, while for women there is a slight negative linear trend for all age categories while the overall linear (very slightly positive) trend is nevertheless highly significant (p<0.0001).
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation between conventional echocardiographic and TSI parameters in STEMI group Across the entire study population, we found that there was a highly significant negative correlation between LVEF and TSI parameters, such as septal-lateral wall delay ( r = −0.665; P = 0.0001), septal-posterior wall delay ( r = −0.978; P = 0.0001), all segments maximum difference ( r = −0.557; P = 0.0001), and dyssynchrony index ( r = −0.608; P = 0.0001).