ty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \chi_{\left(1 \right)}^2 = \,\,\frac{{{{\left({532\,\, \times \,\,53\,\, - 13\,\, \times \,\,73} \right)}^2}\, \times \,\,671}}{{545\,\, \times \,\,126\,\, \times \,\,605\,\, \times \,\,66}} = 181.7 \end{document} The large chi-squared value evidenced a highly significant association between postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients ( p < 0.0001), and the hypothesis of independence between the two symptoms was rejected.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
This yields a highly significant model ( p < 0.0001) and three PCs that collectively explain 94.7% of the variance (Table 2 ).
These differences remained highly significant after controlling for age (ANCOVA p -values <0.0001 to 0.0012).
This study did not show a benefit in OS (adjusted HR 0.78, 95% CI.0.56–1.08; P = 0.13), but did reveal a highly significant improvement in PFS, with 5 year PFS of 47.6 vs. 31.8% for those given immediate adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40–0.73, P < 0.0001).
Moreover, the combined treatment promoted a highly significant increase in the expression of proteins involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, such as PGC-1 α (+284.9%, p < 0.0001) and SIRT5 (+39.5%, p = 0.02), compared to sedentary mice ( Figure 7 ).
All three factors had highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001), and signal intensity levels were compared between the species using Student’s t -test on residuals after the effects of Dye and Subarray had been removed.
Compared with the model group, it had highly significant differences in the blank group, LLP, PCP, and AMX groups ( P < 0.0001), indicating that using different polysaccharides and drugs had different directions of influence on the differences between groups.
Two biological replicates were analyzed for all conditions (i.e., n = 2 per condition), and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) Pearson correlation coefficient values were obtained for each replicate set ( r = 0.9 and 0.855 for p65 ChIP replicates; r = 0.849 and 0.85 for BMAL1 ChIP replicates, and r = 0.890 and 0.888 for CLOCK ChIP replicates in saline and LPS conditions, respectively) ( Supplemental Fig.
Specifically, the interaction effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that the combined influence of MTG concentration and incubation time is critical for understanding their impact on leakage properties.
ANOVA test observed highly significant differences to leaves against other plant parts ( F test = 134.24) ( P value < 0.0001).
A two-way ANOVA analysis using Prism 6 software (GraphPad) identified a highly significant difference in the G and U content between peaks and non-peaks ( p -value < 0.0001).
As expected, there were highly significant differences among the three regional comparisons (Friedman ANOVA: χ 2 2df = 77.82; p <0.0001).
This posed a highly significant difference between the two B12 forms ( p < 0.0001).
Relationship to the clinical manifestations C.albicans was found in four (eight percent) of the fifty cases, which were the only cases with apical radiolucency. Apical radiolucency and the presence of C.albicans were found to have a highly significant correlation ( p <0.0001), according to the statistical analysis.
A highly significant association also existed between the number of circulating aPMPs and CDAI ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2 g).
The difference between the two groups was highly significant with regard to PD and CAL ( P =0.0001 and P =0.001, respectively; Table 2 ).
Although we could not directly compare the miRNA quantification provided by a probe hybridization-based technology (Agilent microRNA microarray) and a digital PCR technology, we analyzed the correlation in microRNA quantification between these two approaches, after data normalization, and observed a highly significant correlation of the data ( p < 0.0001, Spearman r > 0.7) for all the tested cancer types.
Mean pre-ASSUM and post-ASSUM bacterial counts per plate were 4.57 (7.4) colony forming units (CFU) and 0.27 (0.8) CFU, respectively, a highly significant difference (p<0.0001).
The increase in the median survival of ERW-treated mice was highly significant as compared to control mice (p=0.0001) and the relative risk of developing tumors in the control mice was 22.25 as compared to the ERW-treated mice.
When compared to an arbitrary sample with a standard deviation of 100 peptides, the variability observed in the test sample was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001).
While both regions act as mild enhancers in our assay, only the second variant (SNP 2) had a strong and highly significant difference in expression between the social and solitary alleles (Fig. 4c ; one-way ANOVA, F 4,20 = 65.0119, p < 0.0001).
betulinus controlled and treated for all 15 isolates used were highly significant ( F = 5.77, df = 15, P < 0.0001).
2 F ), and this overlap is highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by Fisher’s exact test), proving the similarity of CCGs identified in both NAFLD-HCC screens.
1a ), supra-threshold amplitudes of wave I of the ABR (in response to 50-μs clicks) remained low and showed significantly shallower growth with sound intensity, compared to pre-exposure values (repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for pre-exposure and 4-week post-exposure data showed a significant effect of group, p = 0.043, and a highly significant interaction between time of measurement and sound intensity, p = 0.0001; Fig. 1b ).
The P -values for the interaction terms between each of education level and wealth quintile and the time period variable were highly significant ( P <0.0001 in all models for both unadjusted and adjusted estimates).