Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, it had been noticed that, in those patients who were treated with Paxlovid within 5 days of symptom onset, hospitalization was seen in only 1% (6/607) of patients and no deaths were observed.[ 5 6 ] However, hospitalization was seen in 6.7% (41/612) of patients and deaths in ten patients (1.6%) in the placebo arm.[ 5 6 ] The results of both studies were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, a highly significant difference was found when comparing the TB 1-9 group to the severe COVID-19 group ( p < 0.0001), underscoring a pronounced deviation in magnesium levels corresponding to disease severity, as depicted in the heatmap, with varying shades of blue indicating the strength of the correlations ( Figure 3 ). 2.3.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was no significant correlation between either of the PTH assays and 25(OH)D concentrations in HD patients, but we found a highly significant (P < 0.0001) correlation ( ρ = 0.766) between bAP levels and both PTH assays and between 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH) 2 D levels ( ρ = 0.522).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with two factors (delay time and perturbation frequency) revealed a highly significant interaction (n = 8 subjects, F 4,70 =110.2, p<0.0001), confirming the interdependence of feedback delays and frequencies of constructive/destructive interference.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there were no marked differences between the groups, BDNF levels tended to increase immediately after exercise in both the PLA ( p < 0.001) and GTE (no significant changes) groups as well as post 1 h of recovery in both PLA ( p < 0.05) and GTE (no significant changes) groups, compared to values recorded at rest as reflected by a highly significant time effect (F = 13.73, p < 0.0001; η 2 = 0.49).