“highly significant”

The ANOVA of regression coefficient showed a linear response based on the p -value of ethanol concentrations, which were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), followed by microwave power and extraction time ( Table 2 ).

Thus, both lubricant and counterface roughness had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) on wear, and the effect of counterface roughness depended on the lubricant ( p < 0.0001, interaction term) ( Figure 2 ).

7 a, 8 a), each a greater overshoot than their respective control group: this difference was highly significant for IW ( t score = 9.51, p < 0.0001), but not for KS ( t score = 0.53, p = 0.26).

Highly significant changes were found for: contraindication of vaccination ( P <.0001, RR=0.15); forecasting vaccine requirement ( P <.0001, RR=0.22); EPI target estimation ( P =.0068, RR=0.55); coverage rate calculation ( P <.0023, RR=0.44); dropout rate calculation ( P <.0001, RR=0.27); and preparation of coverage monitoring chart ( P =.0007, RR=0.36).

In the trials Nem19-1 and Nem17-1 eggs per g of root explained 58% of variations in root biomass, and the regression and correlation coefficients were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 ).

es ( \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \sigma_{e}^{2} $$\end{document} σ e 2 ) were always highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for all resistance traits in both models.

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) The ICC values were highly significant (p < 0.0001) for all the measurements, thus rejecting the null hypothesis (Table 3 ).

Multiple comparison analysis using a one-way ANOVA test showed highly significant differences in Sec62 levels all five groups ( p < 0.0001).

The risk was increased by about 3.5 times, irrespectively of proximality definition, and highly significant (OR = 3.58, 95% CI: 2.00–6.43, p < 0.0001; OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.95–5.96, p < 0.0001; respectively).

Between the three groups with pre-operative taxis, without bowel resection and with bowel resection, highly significant differences were identified between the patients with regard to the rates of post-operative complications (4% vs. 6.5% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.0001), complication-related reoperations (1.9% vs. 3.8% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.0001), and mortality rate (0.3% vs. 0.9% vs. 7.5%; p < 0.001).

The linear regression analysis demonstrated that the slope of HFD was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) but not in HFDT ( p = 0.2397) compared with zero.

Highly significant ( p < .0001) correlation was seen (R 2 = .998) for the obtained index S/C values (9.10–1.73) against the log 2 ‐transformed dilution series ( Figure S1 ), indicating that some quantitation is possible with the Abbott CMIA.

However, there is a highly significant correlation between the average length of isotigs and percent BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P < 0 . 0001, Table 4 ), and also between the total sequence length of each isotig group with the proportion of BLAST hits (e.g. hits against ara , P = 0 . 003).

The statistical difference between IDH- m/w groups (Table 2 ) using Mann Whitney test was highly significant for KYN ( P < 0.0001), NLR ( P = 0.0002), TIMP-1 ( P = 0.0405) and hTERT ( P < 0.0001).

Differences in serum anti-N IgG titers between hamsters immunized with the MN vaccine, alone or in combination with S protein vaccines, and sham- or vector-immunized hamsters were highly significant at both Week 3 and Week 8 ( P < 0.0001) (Fig. 7d ).

The difference was highly significant [ t (174) = 5.48, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 1.04].

The cumulative analysis of all sites demonstrates that vaccination resulted in a highly significant reduction of the frequency of positive rated animals in the vaccinated group (59 out of 439, 13.4%) compared to the unvaccinated group (88 out of 270, 32.6%; p < 0.0001).

Group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the scoring system was applicable to younger patients (<60 years of age) and patients with advanced or localized stages of the disease.

Such a mechanism is further suggested by the highly significant regressions (p<0.0001) between log(pCO 2 ) and the estimated contribution of carbonate weathering to TA (R 2 = 0.38), or with Si/Ca 2+ ratios (R 2 = 0.35), i.e.,rock weathering would explain close to 35% of the variance of pCO 2 .

The results of the pairwise t-tests for TomatoRipen-MMT and the best baseline (two-stream CNN) indicated a highly significant improvement (t = 6.18, p < 0.0001) with very large effect size (d = 2.14).

* P < 0.05, significant; ** P < 0.01, very significant; *** P < 0.001, highly significant; **** P < 0.0001, extremely significant, ns P > 0.05, not significant.

Differences between two groups were considered statistically significant when the P -value was < 0.05, highly significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.0001.

Age is also highly significant (younger p < 0.0001 in univariate analysis), as is the prevalence of socioeconomic disadvantage in the local area where respondents live (less disadvantage p = 0.0006 in univariate analysis), but both become non-significant in multivariate analysis, i.e. when analysed in the context of the other independent variables.

HDL-C Patients that died had a highly significant lower serum HDL-C on day 1 of ICU admission (p < 0.0001, meta-analysis t-distribution) with a pooled mean difference of −7.06 mg/dL (95% CI −9.21 to −4.91 mg/dL) across 17 studies with 1542 participants 17 , 20 , 22 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 50 , 51 ( Fig. 3 ).

According to the findings, the mean number of promastigotes showed highly significant differences in different concentrations of crocin ( P ≤0.0001).