Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The second validation step performed by MS-qPCR on core biopsies from 131, 59 and 36 patients with histologically diagnosed PCa, BPH and high-grade PIN, respectively, showed highly significant differences in the methylation status of the APC, TACC2, RARB, DGKZ, C5orf4 and HES5 regions between BPH and PCa ( P <0.0001).
highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Looking at the association between BCR reactivity of DLBCL cells and the presence of hypophosphorylated Ars2 isoform overall, considering data from both cell lines and cases with cryospecimenderived recombinant Fab, the association was statistically highly significant (Fisher exact t -test: two-tailed P <0.0001).
highly significantp < 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model turned out to be highly significant at the permutation test ( p < 10 −4 ), as shown in Figure 9C , and predictive with 100% correct classification rate. 4 Discussion In the present study, the longitudinal multi-omics investigation on a single mother-infant dyad was proposed to examine in depth the relationships among diet composition, gut microbiota metabolism and composition during the transition from breastfeeding to weaning.
highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
41 Both endpoints demonstrated profoundly better results in the colchicine group than in the placebo group that were highly significant, and acetaminophen consumption was substantially lower in the colchicine group (P < .0001 for all outcomes). 41 Leung et al. took a similar approach in 2018. 42 Patients meeting the ACR criteria for symptomatic and radiographic knee OA, along with a positive response to the frequent knee pain quest
highly significantp < 0001the decimal point is missing; read as 0.0001qualifiedgold
Then, a two-way ANOVA factorial analysis revealed that the clinical state of the patients’ plasmas tested (“steady state” versus “acute phase”) had a highly significant effect ( p < 0001) on PS-exposure quantification.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Geographic differences were notable, with the proportion of individuals with probable PTSD ranging from 40.0% to 100% across divisions, yielding a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001), whereas divisions showed minimal variation (Minor vs Majors divisions PR 1.01, 0.64-1.61; p = 0.96); Figure 5 .