Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant correlation was found between NIHSS and FIM ( p < 0.0001), confirming that NIHSS scores are a good predictor of stroke disability in terms of FIM and functional gain. 50 One study also found that there was a significant association between NIHSS and upper extremity impairment and stroke severity. 51 This may explain why there was a significant correlation between NIHSS and ARAT scores for assessing arm function in stroke patients in the present study.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there was a highly significant increase following the 6h of SD in all three groups (2xANOVA: WT: Interaction F 8,137 = 23.2, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,137 = 12.1, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,137 = 27.6, p < 0.0001; Tau : Interaction F 8,91 = 5.5, p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,91 = 3.2, p < 0.005; SD: F 1,91 = 46.7, p < 0.0001; Chimera: Interaction F 8,85 = 9.6 p < 0.0001; Time: F 8,85 = 5.2, p < 0.0001; SD: F 1,85 = 6.5, p < 0.05), direct comparison revealed the slower recovery, as reported by delta power during NREMS, in un-entrained Tau mice ( Figure 5M ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The independent association of early-life BMI on LV end-diastolic volume was highly significant and comparable to the effect of adult BMI (8.01 ml per one SD in early-life BMI; CI 6.43–9.60 ml, p < 0.0001 and 9.92 ml per one SD in adult BMI; CI 8.49–11.35.ml, p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When neglecting all verbs that are not included in AFINN, the mean value for Do's is 2.34 ( std = 0.62, n = 24) and the mean for Don'ts −2.37 ( std = 0.67, n = 19), with again highly significant statistics ( t = 23.28, p < 0.0001 *** ).
The Moral Choice Machine.
Front Artif Intell · 2020 · PMC7861227
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After changing to a higher dialysate K, the decrease in plasma K concentration after dialysis remained highly significant: from 4.59 (4.35–4.80) to 3.77 (3.26–4.07) mEq/L (P < 0.0001) 1 week after switching and from 4.80 (4.58–5.12) to 3.70 (3.36–4.25) mEq/L (P < 0.0001) 2 weeks after switching.
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After adjustment of effect size for potential publication bias using the trim-and-fill correction, missing studies were imputed in the funnel plot, resulting in lower, albeit still highly significant estimate of pooled mean difference (adjusted = +4.7 ETDRS letters; CI 95%: +3.7; +5.7; p<0.0001).