The median values of t 90 were the longest in smokers and the shortest in nonsmokers and this effect was highly significant (p <0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The difference in mean PCoR ratings of the abstracts was highly significant (t = 8.09; p < 0.0001), larger than four-times its standard error.
1A and B , a highly significant effect (P<0.0001) of GOSS on cell viability was found in MM-231 and MM-468 cells at different concentrations of the compound (6.3–100 and 10–50 μM in MM-231 and MM-468, respectively).
Unsurprisingly, this revealed a highly significant effect of awareness (Mann–Whitney U = 0.0001; P < 0.0001); detection of a face stimulus was considerably higher for supraliminal relative to subliminal trials.
The doe parity effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on TD and DMY, while it was non-significant ( p > 0.05) on UW, UD, UC, UDG, and UV.
At 4 wpi, the mean plasma viral load was 4.0 × 10 6 copy eq./mL A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed for all metabolites across all time points and brain regions, and highly significant differences were found (P < 0.0001).
The logistic regression model showed orographic lift to be a highly significant predictor of the probability of low altitude soaring (Wald test, p < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant difference in the treatment method distribution between generalists and specialists ( p < 0.0001) in the sample of displaced fractures of the femoral neck.
Seaweed supplementation increases total plasma and mitochondrial antioxidant capacities The overall effect of dietary seaweed supplementation on plasma total antioxidant capacity, TAC ( Fig 5A ) was highly significant (F 3,20 = 18.7, p < 0.0001).
As expected, there was a highly significant positive relationship between time post-blood meal and the proportion of mosquitoes showing ruptured oocysts (LRT χ 1 2 = 95 , p < 0.0001, figure 4 a ).
This was highly significant ( p <0.0001).
As indicated in Supplementary table 7 , the regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( P = 0.4145).
On average the lethality of social insects is 10.6 ± 17.3 mg/kg (S.D.; n = 77) compared to 52.7 ± 33.2 mg/kg (S.D.; n = 13) for solitary species, a highly significant difference (P = 0.0001, t-test).
Global P -values were highly significant ( P <0.0001) for all models, confirming their robustness.
Results it was observed that, in the osteoarthritic hips, hip neck fracture and aseptic necrosis, the degree of agreement was highly significant (p < 0.0001), in the measurements of anteversion and inclination angles, among the three assessments, from intra as well as inter-observers.
This ratio at baseline was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and was excellent to discriminate between responders (and prolonged PFS) and nonresponders (AUC = 1.0).
These differences in relative gene expression are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 to p < 0.0072), as shown by gene set enrichment analysis (Supporting Information Fig. 2 ).
A highly significant positive correlation existed between FDK and DON/NIV content ( R = 0.84, P < 0.0001).
As the results demonstrated, the fitness of the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
A significant increase of several amino acids including phenylalanine (Phe, p < 0.01), tryptophan (Trp, p < 0.001), and tyrosine (Tyr, p < 0.0001), as well as isoleucine (Ile, p < 0.05), glutamate (Glu, p < 0.05), glutamine (Gln, p < 0.05), and glycine (Gly, p < 0.05) was observed, whereas a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease in cysteine (Cys) was measured.
Frequency of tobacco consumption in pre- and post-health educational interventional phase was found to be highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference in comparison of both of the phases regarding the type of tobacco product consumed [ Table 1 ].
This 1.65-fold gene enrichment is highly significant ( P < 10 − 4 ).
Among the departures from the early burst model, there is a highly significant skew to the right, as shown by the D CDF test on the EB fit ( p < 0.0001).
Overall, the difference between the four groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) due to much earlier gestational age at delivery in women with previous PPROM and treated with Arabin pessary (Figure 2 ).
Overall, zymosan treatment which was used for positive control resulted in a highly significant increase of both types of NETs, i.e., “cell free”- and “anchored”-NETs in bovine PMN ( p < 0.0001; Figures 3E–H ).