The combination treatment group had highly significant cell death (p <0.0001) compared to a single drug, and the NC sensitization caused substantial cell death compared to a single cetuximab treatment (p<0.01).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In all three studies, the primary endpoint was achieved, with a highly significant reduction in PANSS total score from baseline to endpoint (p < 0.0001).
Results: Using Pearson’s correlation, tongue thickness was found to be highly significant in correlation with the Cormack-Lehanegrading along with ratio of Pre-E/E-VC thus to predict difficult laryngoscopy with a significant p value of <0.0001.
➣ Subgrouping of vaccinated cases according to used vaccine revealed three groups: Group 1: Pts received viral vector-based vaccines with adverse events Group 2: Pts received mRNA-based vaccines with adverse events Group 3: Pts received inactivated virus vaccines with adverse events Comparing each two groups as regards adverse events done and revealed the following results Comparing group 1 to group 2 Viral vector-based vaccine group (group 1) showed highly significant increase in cases of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/cerebral venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism with p < 0.0001 In the same context, group 1 had statistically significant increase in cases of DIC ( P = 0.0316), GBS ( P = 0.0036) and ATM ( P = 0.0089).
Alveolar septal fibrosis was observed in 90.9% of patients with IPF (30/33), whereas none of the control subjects exhibited this finding (0/23), indicating a highly significant difference between groups (Fisher's exact test, P<0.0001).
Tukey’s multiple comparison test showed highly significant differences between the control and remission groups ( p < 0.0001), the control and active phase groups ( p < 0.0001), as well as between the remission and active phase groups ( p < 0.0001).
At 30 days post-injury, B cell-treated animals showed highly significant improvement in Y maze performance (p < 0.0001), with better alternation scores as compared to saline-treated ICH controls and values similar to sham-injured controls ( Fig. 2 E).
In this experimental setup, a highly significant difference after treatment between week 0 and 1 was found in the CCl 4 group, resulting in a medium-sized effect (W = 62.5, p value < 0.0001, r CCl4 = 0.64).
genurostris showed highly significant association with pH (χ 2 = 27.16, df = 3, p < 0.0001) and temperature (χ 2 = 10.55, df = 3, p < 0.014)—a hump-shaped curve, peaking at 7 pH and dropping down at temperature between 28 and 30 °C (Fig. 6 ).
DystromiRs All three dystromiRs were markedly elevated in DE50-MD serum ( Figure 5 ): under linear mixed model analysis, genotype was highly significant (P<0.0001) for all three miRs, while the effect of time was not significant for any (though a modest interaction of genotype and time was detected).
Two-way ANOVA (stress × cortical layer) revealed a highly significant difference between cortical layers [F (4, 30) = 40.23, P < 0.0001] and between the two groups [F (1, 30) = 25.59, P < 0.0001)].
Therefore, differences between the CG and the IG were highly significant in both the first and second 6-month follow-up period ( p < 0.0001).
Statistical analysis confirmed the highly significant superiority of CINPs (∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001).
Subsequent analyses of variance of the split-plot design seedling experiment revealed that the ‘RIL’ term was highly significant for necrosis and pycnidia AUDPC scores at p = 0.0001 (Table 3 ).
A highly significant overlap of DEGs in response to reduced Ecd between the two transcriptomic experiments (72%, P ≤ 0.0001, hypergeometric test) underscored the robustness of the molecular phenotype.
Markedly, FOXO3a protein expression showed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) negative correlation with TCRP1 in 144 cases of NSCLC tissues (Fig. 5F ).
The difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001; log‐rank test).
A recent study found a highly significant correlation between the increased expression of miR-125b and CRP/IgE levels (r = 0.86/r = 0.68; p < 0.0001) in asthma patients, indicating the potential relevance of this miRNA for particular asthma phenotypes.
Consistent with this, there was a highly significant correlation between the levels of anti-Sm near the time of biopsy and at the time of patient enrollment ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 D).
A smoothed spline Cox PH model (Figure 3 ) showed a highly significant ( P value <0.0001), mostly linear relationship between patient age and increasing risk for log‐transformed mortality.
When articles were normalized to ensure that each journal counted equally, differences for Altmetric scores and number of tweets were highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 3 ).
AIA score, on the experiment termination day (day 21), showed highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) in TXR200 followed by DS ( p = 0.0006) and TXR100 and TXR50 groups (both p = 0.002). 3.2.3 Reduction in Footpad Thickness Upon TXR Treatment Significant reduction of mean footpad thickness in TXR-treated groups was observed in a dose-dependent manner ( Figure 3B ).
This doubling of prevalence was highly significant with a difference of 3.7% ( z = 4.10, p < 0.0001).
All correlations were highly significant for the ABL/ALN group ( p < 0.0001), which supports our hypothesis but does not indicate whether these relationships are driven by differences in skeletal alendronate uptake, the extent of remodeling space and closure thereof, or other factors.
Biochemical profile outside of acute decompensations Plasma amino acid levels differed significantly with disease status and age, showing a highly significant interaction for glycine (p = 0.0001; Table 1 A).