“highly significant”

The superiority of BBSNet is statistically unequivocal, as confirmed by highly significant t -tests (all p -values < 0.0001) comparing its performance to each benchmark backbone.

As shown in Table 1 , differences in DNA methylation between treatments were highly significant, with a Φ ST value from AMOVA for epigenetic variation among treatments of 0.2781 ( p value < 0.0001).

Highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001) of treatment and interaction on enzyme activity was recorded (Table 1 ).

Follow-up (bonferroni corrected) comparisons revealed that this effect was driven by a highly significant effect of sound within the human made target group ( p < .0001).

A meta-analysis based mainly on the findings of six studies pertaining to treatment with clozapine supported a significant overall beneficial effect on suicidal behavior, with a highly significant ( p < 0.0001), 3.3-fold [CI: 1.7–5.7] lower pooled risk of suicidal behaviors with clozapine compared to alternative treatments [ 41 ].

This shows that the RC is lower (fewer samples and lower ADAb titre in this model) but continues to be highly significant [RC −3.70 (95% CI: −5.01 to −2.32), P < 0.0001].

Thus, unpaired t -test reported a highly significant difference between the surface characteristics of control arch-wires and the test arch-wires ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 1 and Figure 4 ].

To further validate the relevance of Sox9 and Sparc for the osteo‐lineage cells and chondrocyte populations, we analyzed the coexpression of the regulating element ( Sox9 ) with the osteonectin coding gene ( Sparc ), which was highly significant ( R = 0.86, p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 G ).

Changes in semen parameters There was a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in mean sperm count in animals treated with HAART (0.74 ± 0.30 × 10 6 /mL), HAART + VCO (0.93 ± 0.34 × 10 6 /mL) and VCO (1.86 ± 0.54 × 10 6 /mL) respectively when compared with control (5.67 ± 0.26 × 10 6 /mL).

Mean difference between postsurgery clinical versus postsurgery CBCT measurements was 0.93 mm which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001), indicating underestimation of postsurgery clinical measurements compared to postsurgery CBCT measurements [ Table 2 ].

Additional statistical analyses based on post hoc estimates confirmed that, for simultaneous investigation of body weight and BMI, the influence of body weight on exposure was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and of similar magnitude as in the main analysis.

Overall shell shape variation among populations was highly significant (One-Way Permanova, global F =21.68, p = 0.0001) and all pairwise comparisons between locations showed significant differences ( Table 3 ).

9.2 ± 5.9 mm 2 , P < 0.0001, respectively); however, the correlation between the two measurements was highly significant (VA: r = 0.78, P < 0.0001 and LA: r = 0.75, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ).

Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences among the three tissue types (F = 152.63, p < 0.0001), with multiple comparison analysis showing significant differences between cancellous bone and knee cartilage, cancellous bone and muscle, and knee cartilage and muscle (all p < 0.0001).

Despite these adjustments, all the RRs for mental disorders in the presence of abortion in these data are substantial and highly significant at p < 0.0001.

The model was highly significant, F(4, 47) = 68.83, p < 0.0001, explaining 84.2% of the adjusted variance in QoL (adjusted R 2 = 0.842).

The difference in ciliostasis between the strain-GD-infected group and the control group was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Logarithmical relative fold change expression for all five miRNAs of exposed individuals were found highly significant with p values <0.0001 compared with non-exposed group.

Comparison of the IHC and single-plex immunofluorescence revealed highly significant positive correlations between the cell densities of CD8, CD68, CD16, PD-L1 and SOX10 marker positive cells (Spearman’s rho = 0.927 to 0.750, p < 0.0001).

Second, all the model statistics were highly significant ( p < .0001), excepted for the inferior lateral ventricle model for AD which was only significant ( p < .05). 3.3 Classification based on multiple lifespan models To evaluate the classification performance of HAVAs on testing datasets, we performed a comparison with the three most discriminant structures.

Those shifts ranged from a modest four-percentage-point increase in support of legalization to a substantial 12-point jump in the share who said it us “safe for pit bulls to live in residential neighborhoods.” The differences in percentages from 2014 to 2018 for the first three questions in Figure 1 are all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the four-point difference in support for legalization shown in the final column of the figure is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

By this global comparison differences between sections as well as differences between localizations were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

4 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Recurrence with supra-auricular was 4 (1.2%) and with sinusectomy was 76 (8.1%) with a highly significant difference (X 2 = 19.874; p < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

BM32 induced highly significant allergen-specific IgG responses (P < 0.0001) but no allergen-specific IgE.

The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.0001).