“highly significant”

Statistical analysis using an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference in galectin-3 levels among cases and controls when classified into sub-groups based on their LVEF (p<0.0001).

The extraction temperature ( X 2 ) and time ( X 3 ) showed a highly significant impact on the extracted amount of rhein because of their p -values of <0.0001.

When we look at the accumulation of [ 57 Co]-B12 in the individual fetuses ( Figure 4 H), this trend becomes highly significant (5-week 1C imbalanced, p = 0.0001; 7-week 1C imbalanced fetuses, p = 0.0001) ( Figure 4 ).

A highly significant positive trend in hatchability was observed for the brown layer line ( P = 0.0001), with hatching rates increasing from 52% at ED4 to 87% at ED7.

The analysis of variance revealed that genotypes maintained highly significant (p < 0.0001) differences for final disease severity at both locations in the two cropping seasons ( Table 2 ).

Also, there was a highly significant association ( p -value <0.0001) between each trough concentration, peak concentration, AUCτ, AUC 24h , Cl, V d with AKI occurrence, which indicates that these pharmacokinetic parameters would be considered as suitable parameters in vancomycin-induced AKI prediction.

The MANOVA on Procrustes coordinates was found to be highly significant, suggesting that wing shape varies significantly among months in females (F = 11.59, df = 90, p < 0.0001) and males (F = 12.08, df = 90, p < 0.0001).

In both the citalopram and pramipexole groups, the BDI score showed a highly significant decrease with a large effect size ( r ≥ 0.6) analyzed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test ( Z = −4.018, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.877 for citalopram group and Z = −3.926, P < 0.0001, and r = −0.878 for pramipexole group).

Friedman's analysis of variance revealed that there was a highly significant variation at all frequencies (p = 0.0001).

These two antigen assays showed a highly significant correlation with a Pearson’s r of 0.96 ( p < 0.0001) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

For pTau181, we observed highly significant effect modification by amyloid status (interaction β = 0.65, p < 0.0001).

Similarly, the correlation of the infection neutralization capacity of Omicron BA.1 and NAb was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and moderately (rho = 0.44) positive.

The effects of KYNA on 29 Delay cells from this younger animal were highly significant (Fig. 2e ; firing rate: F(1,28) = 23.72, p < 0.0001; d’: T dep = 6.691, p < 0.0001).

We found highly significant differences in the relative volume of all brain regions across populations (all regions p < 0.0001, figure 2 ; electronic supplementary material, figure S7 and table S9), and between sexes (all regions p < 0.05, figure 2 ; electronic supplementary material, table S9).

Mir-148a-3p exhibited a highly significant modification with a p -value < 0.0001, while mir-106a-5p had a p -value of 0.0168 when comparing the PCa group versus the BHP group.

Wound healing was markedly faster in both low and high dose CuSQ-treated groups as compared to the control and standard groups as they had highly significant greater area under the curve (AUC) throughout the study period ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 C). 2.10.

Construct validity of the 31-item Likert scale was supported by an overall Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy (MSA) value of 0.853 (range 0.766 to 0.902), along with a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity (P < 0.0001), indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis ( Table 3 ).

Results Both models revealed a highly significant disparity in work stress among the different groups ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).

Although risk group classification was highly significant on univariate analysis (p=0.0001; worsened outcome with increased risk group), this finding disappeared on multivariable analysis.

subternata growth inhibition against the various Fusarium strains at various concentrations was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2A ), indicating a higher growth inhibition rate by rooibos extract.

P values were represented as asterisks; p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant: 0.01–0.05, significant (*); 0.01–0.001, very significant (**); 0.001–0.0001, highly significant (***); p<0.0001, extremely significant (****).

Nevertheless, on day 7 which was 2 days after the 3rd dose of STZ injection, all groups that received STZ showed a highly significant difference in fasting BGL as compared to the control group injected with saline ( p < 0.0001).

However, a highly significant difference was observed among the groups for pain scoring, with a p-value of <0.0001 at all times (Table 2 ).

The statistical significance of the overlap between MSH2 peaks and promoters (−1000 + 0 of TSS) was calculated using the enrichPeakOverlap function and found to be highly significant ( p = 0.0001).