Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the 325 mg cohort, plasma salicylate (1061–6299 ng/mL) and salicylurate (673–3355 ng/mL) were detected in 21/21 (100%) subjects ( Figure 4 B), gentisic acid (39–283 ng/mL) was detected in 20/21 (95%) subjects, and salicyl acyl glucuronide (31–396 ng/mL) was detected in 21/21 (100%) subjects ( Figure 4 C) following ASA exposure and were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for each metabolite, paired t -tests).
a significant trendp<0·00010.0× alphagold
highly significantp<0·00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analyses of tumour characteristics by year of diagnosis showed a significant trend towards lower risk tumours in more recent years, driven by a highly significant trend towards lower nodal status (p<0·0001 for both oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative groups; table 1 ; appendix p 35 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the medial and inferior constrictor muscles, cricopharyngeal muscle, glottic and supraglottic laryngeal areas, arytenoid cartilages, contralateral major salivary glands highly significant dose reductions ( p < 0.0001) of more than 10 Gy were achieved in study treatment plan compared to standard treatment plan.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean divergence between VAS and WOMAC weight-bearing pain did not vary significantly with KL grade ( P = 0.72), but a highly significant trend was found for larger mean divergence in VAS and WOMAC non–weight-bearing pain with increasing KL grade ( P < 0.0001) (Figs. 3 A–C). 4.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant variation ( p < 0.0001) between the two settings in reported answers on handwashing after touching raw chicken—while 90.4% of respondents in Egypt indicated they washed their hands with soapy water, only 27.2% of respondents in Iraq indicated doing so.
highly significantp ≤ 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
rmANOVA regarding response time showed a highly significant main effect of order, F (2, 38) = 12.13, p ≤ 0.0001, but not regarding condition, F (1, 19) = 1.36, p = 0.26, as well as no interaction effect of order and condition, F (1.24,23.56) = 0.22, p = 0.7.