“highly significant”

Following data reduction using PCA there was a highly significant difference in the PERMANOVA ( P =0.0001) in the post-test analysis between the following groups of cats: healthy and FORL-1 ( P <0.0001), FORL-1 and FORL-2 ( P <0.0001).

The results of the pairwise t-tests for TomatoRipen-MMT and the best baseline (two-stream CNN) indicated a highly significant improvement (t = 6.18, p < 0.0001) with very large effect size (d = 2.14).

The highly significant differences between CSF and paired peripheral blood lymphoid phenotype ( p <0.0001) confirms the existence of an active mechanism of lymphoid migration through the meninges. cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytes flow cytometry NHL cerebral lymphatic system The CSF population was represented by lymphocytes (77%; range 20–100%) together with a minor population of monocytes (CD4-weak or CD14-positive 15%; range 0–70%).

We find a highly significant correlation between p53 protein synthesis in leukemic blast cells and the secondary plating efficiency of these cells (p = 0.0001).

The difference in heme levels between the Sham group and the ischemic core region was highly significant (P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2 d).

The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated a highly significant difference in SUV mean across age groups in males (H = 25.46, p < 0.0001), with a trend in females (H = 8.52, p = 0.074).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.0689 > 0.05).

A one-way ANOVA demonstrated highly significant differences between treatments for the number of subitaneous eggs (F 5,18 = 30.023, p<0.0001, Fig. 2A ).

This difference is highly significant for both DZr and MZr (P<0,0001 for both comparisons).

Statistical analysis using Mann Whitney test showed that the differences between control and treated groups were highly significant with P value <0.0001 in all cases ( Figure 6 ).

Reduction from baseline of total, inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts were highly significant in both the groups ( P <0.0001), but between group differences were not significant.

The analysis across all 673 loci yielded highly significant differentiation ( p << 10 −4 ) between pairs of superpopulations.

Photographs of 15 randomly chosen sparrows were measured again several months later; repeatability between measures was highly significant for all four ornament variables (all R i >0.81, all F >10.17, all P <0.0001).

Omnibus testing demonstrates that the effect of T and D on the expression of these genes is highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Results ANOVA showed a highly significant influence of time both on tryptophan and on serotonin, in all horses, on either day, with p values < 0.0001.

For all 16 intersections of pairs of gene lists, the enrichment was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table S2 ).

Pedigree-based estimates of the mean inbreeding coefficient, F ped , are available for 17 of the 51 populations and show highly significant and strong correlations with the very long ROH observed, peaking for the sum of ROH >10 Mb ( r = 0.87, p ≤0.0001).

Concerning attention behavior during familiarization, a repeated-measures ANOVA with looking time as dependent measure, language group (Catalan, Spanish, bilingual) and familiarization condition (TB or GM) as a between-group factors and trial (first, last) as repeated measures revealed a highly significant effect of familiarization trial [ F (1, 48) = 42.9; p = 0.0001; η 2 = 0.47], and no effect of language group or condition and no significant interactions [familiarization trial × language group: F (2, 48) = 1.15; p = 0.32; η 2 = 0.04; familiarization trial × condition: F (1, 48) = 1.7; p = 0.19; η 2 = 0.03; familiarization trial × language group × condition: F < 1].

Tumor-to-blood ratios increased significantly over time for both tracers; however, [ 52 Mn]Mn-BPPA-bevacizumab demonstrated significantly higher ratios from day 2 onward, with the difference becoming highly significant at days 3, 5, 7, and 10 ( p < 0.0001).

The ANOVA for the regression model ( Table 2 ) indicated the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 98.67%).

For all six species, it is lower in overall genomic DNA relative to protein coding DNA (this was highly significant for all six pairwise comparisons, p < 10 −4 , MWU‐test).

• HER2 status and HER2/CEP17 ratio: A highly significant association was found (P = 0.0001).

These observations were statistically validated with a Kruskal-Wallis H test, which showed a highly significant result (P < 0.0001), confirming that the medians of the ratios differed significantly across the four phases.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the LAC model shown in Table 3 indicates a highly significant regression model (F = 543.88, p < 0.0001), accounting for a considerable percentage of the variance in the data.

We found a highly significant and marked response of control neurons to 100 nM orexin A, while the Ox1R knockout neurons did not respond (control: p<0.0001, n=71; Ox1R ΔDAT : p=0.5, n=86; one sample t-test for each group) ( Figure 1L ).