“highly significant”

Controlling for these potential effects, the method remained highly significant (P < 0.0001).

Statistical analyses revealed highly significant differences between infected groups sampled at 12 h and 96 h for both genes ( p < 0.0001).

Conversely, treatment with 20 μg/mL oleacein reduced the mean lifespan by 34% relative to control S-base and DMSO; this was an effect that was highly significant (LogRank p > 0.0001).

Logistic regression analysis showed a highly significant effect of PPF resistance on mosquito susceptibility to ZIKV infection (χ 2 = 41.50, df = 5, p < 0.0001).

A consistent decline in the number of AK lesions from day 3 to day 29 was observed for all three active treatments, and the difference between active treatments and vehicle was highly significant at day 57 ( p <0.0001) [ Table 1 ].[ 11 ] The severity of local skin reactions in the active treatment groups followed a dose-dependent pattern, peaked between days 3 and 8 then largely resolved by day 15.

By performing a stepwise discriminant analysis, it is possible to identify and correctly classify 100% of the burgers using only two variables corresponding to the FA, C20:2n-6 and C18:1n-9, and the model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001 *; Wilks Lambda value: 0.00475) which is possible to see in Table 6 .

Fitting the Mathematical Models Highly significant second-order polynomial models ( p < 0.0001) with an insignificant lack-of-fit were satisfactorily fitted to predict the independent variables based on the multiple linear regression analysis of the experimental data ( Table 2 ).

Consequently, the AHRU group showed higher scores in all three scoring systems, with a highly significant difference (all p < 0.0001) in comparison to the non-AHRU group (CHAMPS: 2.5 (2, 4) vs. 1 (0, 2); NOBLADS: 4 (3, 5) vs. 3 (2, 4); ABC: 3.5 (2, 7) vs. 2 (1, 4)), suggesting that AHRU was potentially associated with worse clinical outcomes.

This demonstrated a highly significant decrease in the early survival of Tcf12 ra/ra ( Supplementary Table S3 ; P < 0.0001).

For all assays, the effect of sa-mRNA dose (1.0 vs 0.01 μg) was highly significant (p < 0.0001, 2-way ANOVA).

A highly significant difference was observed among age groups ( χ2 = 18.99 , P < 0.0001 ).

Figure 2B illustrates the comparison of true versus predicted ages, yielding a Pearson correlation coefficient r of 0.56 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

Differences between concentrations were highly significant (P < 0.0001; F 6,45 = 26.92).

The occurrence of each of these features is highly significant (P<0.0001, Fisher’s exact test, two tailed) for none of these features was observed in the 351 non duplication mice generated in the cross.

A first study including 229 PCOS patients and 150 controls reported a highly significant association of Gln223Arg SNP in the LEPR gene with the development of PCOS ( p < 0.0001) [ 129 ].

A Mann Witney comparison showed that this difference was highly significant with p < 0.0001 adjusted for ties.

ANOVA results indicated a highly significant model, as demonstrated by an exceptionally high F-value of 644.09 and a low probability value (p-value < 0.0001), underscoring the reliability of the developed model (Table 5 ).

A highly significant correlation between CNP and TNF-α (p<0.0001) was detected in cardiac tissue ( Fig. 6 ).

In addition, Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (p <0.0001), demonstrating sufficient intercorrelations among the variables.

But given the number of phonemes presented to the participants, our results are highly significant: all p < 10−4.

The spine density per 100 μm of dendrite was 30.7 ± 3.7, compared to corresponding values of 15.9 ± 5.1 for the GRPR cells 18 , and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001; t-test; Fig. 8 e).

At 1 mm apical to TP, group differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with no time ( p = 0.93) or interaction effects ( p = 0.70).

This improvement was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) in terms of the paired comparison of AUC between the two versions of the tool.

Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant time x virus interaction (F_{3,24} = 14.2, p < 0.0001), confirming that the observed cytoskeletal remodeling is US3-dependent rather than a consequence of generalized viral replication ( n = 3 biological replicates per condition; full ANOVA output in Supplementary Data S1 ).

Results from the two‐way ANOVA indicate a highly significant main effect of season ( F = 405.09, p < 0.0001), with giraffe presence in all the locations being substantially lower in the wet season ( M wet = 1.69 days/month) as compared to the dry season ( M dry = 19.34 days/month).