“highly significant”

A-levels education and no education both showed highly significant associations with delayed recall (p=4.0e-5 and 7.7e-7) and learning (p=7.6e-6 and 5.0e-8).

Regression analysis on all data points found a weak, but highly significant, positive relationship between sensation level and P1 amplitude ( r =0.41) [ r 2 =0.17, F(1.90)=18.6, P=0.00004, intercept=2.79 μV, slope=0.09 μV/dB].

sIL‐2R levels correlated with TMTV Pearson's correlation tests demonstrated highly significant positive correlation between sIL‐2R and TMTV ( R 2 = 0.490; P = 0.00004, Figure 2 A). 3.4.

However, a highly significant, strong direct association was expressed between BMI and adiponectin in the controls before intervention (r = 0.83, p = 0.00004).

We found a highly significant inverse correlation (p = 0.00004, r = −0.734) between these two clinical scores ( Table 2 + Supplemental Fig.

In addition, no genotype x diagnosis interaction was exposed [ F (1,2, 112) = 0.389, p = 0.678], though there was a highly significant effect of diagnosis on the error rate [ F (1, 116) = 19.02, p = 0.00004] (Fig. 2 a).

Thus, the statistical evaluation showed a much lower relapse rate in the group with uncomplicated UTIs in comparison to complicated or recurring UTIs for all three analyzed time periods, which was highly significant ( p = 0.00004).

The results of decaycorrected ex vivo organ activity (Table 1 ) confirmed the in vivo measurements and showed a highly significant correlation (Spearman’s Rho: 0.9091; p = 0.00004; mean difference ratio: 0.92; lower limit of agreement: 0.65; upper limit of agreement: 1.20).

Results Stimulus Ratings The results of the repeated-measures ANOVA show a highly significant interaction between condition, pitch, and response ( F (6, 78) = 23.31, ε = 0.22, P = 0.00004, η p 2 = 0.64).

Results As expected, a highly significant association (p = 0.00004) was found with rs3763313, corresponding to the well established major effect of the MHC [12] .

Analysis of variance based on the longitudinal mixed-effects model revealed a highly significant main effect of treatment group ( p = 0.00004), whereas neither the main effect of time ( p = 0.17076) nor the group × time interaction ( p = 0.89380) reached statistical significance (Supplementary File 2 ).

Three-parameter linear/ k th-power regression fits obtained to each combined set of ARE- bla - or ARE- luc -assay response data provided good fits ( R 2 = .99 or .91, respectively, P fit > .99) that each incorporate a highly significant negative initial linear slope ( P = 4 × 10 −5 or .00025) and an overall J-shaped DR pattern.

This difference in proportions is highly significant ( P < 4E-5, Fisher’s exact test, two-sided).

In Table 1 , the results of the model averaging are displayed with the factors contained in the final, all being highly significant (tissue p = 4 × 10 −5 ; density/tissue p = 0.0006; density p = 0.004) with the exception of the factor gene, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

ANOVA demonstrated highly significant differences in the average volume per tree among the four formulas ( p value = 0.00004) for both standing tree and log volume, and further analysis using Tukey’s HSD indicated that the Quarter girth and form factor–based formula for standing trees differed significantly from the allometric equation for standing timber, while other formula combinations did not show significant differences.

Results The proportion of mothers not breastfeeding at four months of age showed a highly significant trend across the neighbourhood strata (p = 0.00004): from 16.3% (< 10% with low purchasing power) to 29.4% (≥ 30% with low purchasing power), yielding an OR of 2.24 (95% confidence interval: 1.45-3.16).

In the simpler model without the interaction term, there was a highly significant effect of gender (beta = 49.5, 95% CI 26.7 to 72.3, p = 0.00004), but no significant effect of genotype on TGMV (beta = −1.973, 95% CI −19.4 to 15.4, p = 0.822).

Further, using all available follow-up (median 8.6 years), the absolute difference between treatments was substantially larger (60 vs 24 cases, 5.26% vs 2.07%, difference 3.19%) and this difference in proportions was highly significant ( P = 0.00004) [[ 13 ], Table 3].

However, the rate at which the therapist provided prompts was a highly significant predictor of subject response rate ( b = 0.480, p = 0.00004; Figure 3 ).

The difference in hover frequency between spring and autumn is highly significant ( p < .00004, two‐tailed randomization test). 3.6.3 Summer Hover frequencies were recorded in late June and in July.

A strong and highly significant positive correlation was also found between p-tau217 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a marker of cellular damage and systemic inflammation ( r = 0.595, p = 0.00004; Figure 3 B).

The comparison of the frequency of AML specific mutations in the PDX panel and data of an AML patient population from TCGA revealed a highly significant correlation of both data sets (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.81, p < 0.00004).

A highly significant difference was detected in hemoglobin levels among GSD1b patients (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, V = 253, p -value ≈ 4.028e−05).

Consistent with these opposite changes in rates, there was a highly significant drop in the correlation of events in the two networks ( n = 9 brain slices; pre‐cut R 2 range = 0.83–0.98; post‐cut R 2 range = 0.33–0.58; P = 4.1 × 10 −5 ; Wilcoxon rank sum test).

There was a total of 16 variants of the GTF2F2 region that produced a highly significant signal ( P = 4.1 × 10 -5 - 5.28 × 10 -6 ), whereas the two variants of KCTD4 were not associated with NCP 4 ( P = 0.02 - 0.03).