“highly significant”

Highly significant differences in plant growth (PRA29) were observed when flm-3 was complemented by either of the QTL alleles ( p = 2.638e−05).

The correlation between ALDH5A1 and beta-alanine was highly significant ( r = –0.24; p = 2.7 × 10 -5 ).

As shown in Fig 5 , a highly significant correlation between LV active force σ and the Seattle 5-year score was found (R = 0.77, p = 2.7x10 -5 ).

Methods Ligand binding site similarity between COMT and InhA Previously, the SOIPPA algorithm had revealed a highly significant similarity (p-value = 2.7e-5) between the NAD binding site of the Rossmann fold and SAM binding site of the SAM methyltransferases [11] .

NPA difference in peak ChBF increase with NTS stimulation was highly significant ( p = 0.028 × 10 3 ; Figures 6 , 8 ).

A highly significant relationship was observed between the RS and the likelihood of DM whether the RS was treated as a continuous (Wald test; HR = 2.76, Scaled HR; 5.65; p = 2.8 × 10 −5 ), or a binary (log-rank test: HR = 8.25; p = 8.0 × 10 −4 ) variable (Figure 1A ).

The tumor-subtype and stage-dependent expression of JUN was highly significant when comparing healthy and primary ( p = 2.8e-05), primary and metastatic CRPC ( p = 2.6e-43) and primary and metastatic NEPC ( p = 5.3e-04) (Supplementary Fig. 1g), suggesting JUN as a potential marker of progressive subtypes of PCa.

The idh2 ∆ single mutant was 2.5-fold more resistant to fluconazole (IC50 = 59.4 ± 1.1 μg/mL) than wild-type BG14 (IC50 = 24.1 ± 0.9 μg/mL) and the difference was highly significant ( P = 2.8E-5, n = 3, Student’s t -test).

However, at 35 °C, all three segments had highly significant effects (one-way ANOVAs, p values ≤ 2.8 × 10 −5 ; Fig. 2f ).

Consistently, a drop in dispersion test showed a highly significant decrease of dispersion upon incorporation of mean intraoperative dBP, liquid balance of length of surgery into the regression formula (F statistic 8.3912, p = 0.000028737), while the addition of mean intraoperative MAP had no further significant effect (F statistic 2.989612, p = 0.085425).

Histopathological findings across MVI cohort A highly significant association was observed between microvascular inflammation and C4d positivity (p=0.000029).

When the imbalances observed in our samples at the SNPs rs6983267 , rs961253 , rs3802842 , rs10411210 , rs4444235 , rs4779584 , and rs9929218 were combined with those published previously [19] , [35] , we observed a highly significant relative loss of the non-risk T allele of rs6983267 (p-value = 2.94×10 −5 ).

Compared with population data, enrichment of SIX1 loss-of-function variants was highly significant (p=0.00003).

Nonetheless, the difference in tumor growth between +dox and -dox was highly significant ( p = 0.00003).

This differences in the percentage of infections were highly significant when compared by chi-square test (Pearson’s chi-square = 17.231; p -value = 0.00003).

The dust sheet test 2–3 h showed the highest correlation with the reference method with the data points scattered closely around the regression line and the slope being highly significant ( p = 0.00003).

FI was the most highly significant factor between patient groups with a good and poor outcome ( P =0.00003, independent groups t -test, t =−4.38, df 98).

There were highly significant differences between the mean PRS in affected women at baseline compared to unaffected women in each cohort as well as the combined set (p=3x10 −5 , 1x10 −6 , and1x10 −10 , respectively).

The difference in the GPi cell firing frequency across the groups was highly significant ( figure 2 C p=0.00003).

This highly significant enrichment of S-aromatic motifs within the low-reactivity group (p-value = 3 × 10 −5 ), allows us to conclude that the involved methionines exhibit a much lower reactivity than their non-interacting counterparts.

In all cases, there was a clear bias of propagation in one orientation, which was highly significant ( P < 3 * 10 −5 ; 12 retinas aged P4–6; data not illustrated).

Furthermore, we also confirmed there was a highly significant correlation between MM and GS in this module (Cor = 0.47, p =3 e − 05) ( Figure 3(d) ).

This difference is highly significant ( P = 0.00003), calculated using a χ 2 test. 10 Financial disclosures are summarized in Table 1 .

However, the KNN classifier trained on the exonic subset of features showed no statistically significant difference in BCR-free survival using a log-rank test ( p < 0.08) whereas the difference was highly significant for the non-exonic KNN classifier ( p < 0.00003).

filters F3+F4; 365 SNPs in 396) (Table 3 ), a highly significant difference was found in the final number of SNPs recovered with call rates ≥ 95%, (Chi-square Pearson = 17.40; p = 0.00003).