Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pairwise F ST values with outlier SNPs were all highly significant ( p < 0.00001) and were highest for comparisons involving the conventional plot ( F ST = 0.071 for conventional versus semi-conventional; F ST = 0.070 for conventional versus semi-organic; F ST = 0.049 for semi-conventional versus semi-organic).
highly significantp < 1E−050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Relative to the codon frequency of the native DNA, the Mann-Whitney-Wilcox rank-sum analysis of the optimized CDSs shows that two are non-significantly (n.s.) optimized, four exhibit a p value between 1.4E−03 and 7.7E−04, and three are highly significant with a p < 1E−05 (GenScript, GeneArt, COOL).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our study therefore demonstrated highly significant ( p < 0.00001) recovery of a VH3-enriched set of B cells and our findings therefore confirmed the selection of SpA-binding switched post-germinal center B cells that was solely based on the VH region and was apparently not affected by light chain usage.
highly significantp<0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Table 3 reports the final hierarchical AMOVA confirming that the northern populations (grouped to be compared with the other populations) were strongly differentiated from those of central Italy with high and highly significant fixation index (Φ CT = 0.666, p<0.00001).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This analysis focused on the remaining three high-quality RCTs (n = 217), revealing strengthened evidence for topical CCBs: the odds ratio for unhealed fissures increased to 3.12 (95% CI = 1.78–5.47, p < 0.0001), while the previously nonsignificant difference in side effects became highly significant (OR = 13.16, 95% CI = 5.05–34.3, p < 0.00001) with resolved heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%).
highly significantp=0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was very highly significant difference in the marital status of the two groups of study p=0.00001; HIV+ve had more divorcees and widows than HIV-ve (8.6% vs 1.9%), (25.7% vs3.8%) respectively and 88.9% (n=24/27) of the HIV+ve widows testified that their husbands died of HIV infections.
highly significantp <.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant fit was observed for the logistic transform of the COV-ranked sub- meta -analyses (r 2 = 0.95, p <.00001, inflection point at COV = 19%, Table 2 ), with larger choline effect sizes in studies with COV ≤ 19% ( Fig. 8 ).