“highly significant”

The cumulative occupational exposure Occup_PAHs was highly significant ( p = 0.00001) in coke-oven workers compared to control subjects, for whom it was always zero, as well as the urinary excretion of 1-pyrenol ( p = 0.00001).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.00001) in favor of endovascular coiling [ Figure 3a ].

These differences are highly significant ( p < 0.00001) whether compared as frequency, average, or normalized by CNV size.

Faculties (JRs and BDS) and interns of medical and dental knew that BLS can be performed both inside and outside the hospital setup unlike the other groups, which showed the statistically highly significant P = 0.00001 (Q4).

Mean linearized ITs of the ALDVICO to all pathogen races of the same species were positively correlated with one another and highly significant (P< 0.00001) ( Supplementary Figure S4 ).

An analysis of IBD between individuals for the full dataset was highly significant ( p < 0.00001).

5 C, D indicated that the correlation between estimated and ground-truth EC was highly significant ( p < 1e-5) for low NSR (NSR < 0.3) and remained significant ( p < 0.005) even for large NSR (NSR ≥ 0.3).

In terms of tumor size, margin positivity increased with tumor size: 37.5% for T1 tumors, 24.09% for T2 and 64.81% for T3 tumors, with a highly significant association ( p < 0.00001) (Table 7 ).

For WGA-specific antibodies, the p values are listed as p > 0.05 for 25 different tissue antigens and highly significant p values ( p < 0.00001) for 37 antigens.

This difference was highly significant (χ 2 = 30.12, P < 0.00001), with a RR of 7.14 (95% CI: 3.58–14.23), suggesting that tubing obstruction may significantly contribute to urinary stasis and infection.

The test for overall effect was highly significant (Z = 4.52, P < 0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity observed across the trials (I 2 = 58%).

Concurrently, it establishes with highly significant evidence the definite advantage of aspirin in reducing the risk of minor bleeding (OR = 0.57, p < 0.00001).

Hence, undertaking multiple comparisons the overall global improvement with AOTG remains highly significant ( p < 0.00001), while each of the domains remain significant with two or one sided tests.

The difference between hPL and PPP arms was found to be statistically highly significant in favour of hPL arm with P < 0.00001.

The meta-analysis revealed substantial between-study variance (Tau2 = 684.19) and a highly significant Chi-squared test for heterogeneity (Chi2 = 330.07, p < 0.00001), indicating that the variation in effect estimates was predominantly attributable to differences among studies rather than sampling error.

At 0% the low α-diversity of phototrophs was highly significant to diversities at 20% (June) (t = −8.85, df = 12, p < 0.00001 ) and at 45% (December) intermittence (t = −8.4, df = 21, p < 0.00001 ) ( Table S5 ).

After quality control and differential analysis, we identified 298 highly significant DMSs (p ≤ 1E-5).

The conversion rate was 2.53% ( n = 133/5263) in the robotic and 11.94% ( n = 3874/32,442) in the laparoscopic group, and was highly significant to the favor of the robotic group ( p < 0.00001). 4.

The chromatic differences between guppies and backgrounds (ΔS) are all highly significant ( p < 0.00001) for both light environments ( FS and OC , Table 3 and Figure S12 ), with ΔS >>1 ( Table 3 and Figure S11 ), indicating strong chromatic contrast between guppies and both spacelight and substrates.

Our meta-analysis found a highly significant difference between the two groups (MD = −0.95, 95% CI, [−1.27–0.64], P < 0.00001, Fig. 6 ).

The overall effect was also highly significant (Z = 5.20, P < 0.00001) (Fig. 4 b).

Finally, we tested our key predictive variable (ACE count with and without AAA support) against five different individual or combined dependent variables (Table 2 ) with, in each case, the overall contribution of the variable being highly significant at P <0.00001.

= 0.0252) from the 198 unrelated individuals with ASD/ID (Table 1 ) which is a highly significant difference from European population frequencies from GnomAD ( p < 0.00001; OR = 30.6 with 95% CI 16.27 and 57.59).

This difference, favoring the untreated patients, is highly significant ( P < 0.00001). 19 Hematomas are not inconsequential. 11 Blood transfusions should rarely be needed for cosmetic surgery patients.

The comparison between PSADT and the primary PSA level also revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.00001).