“highly significant”

The power of the TCI to predict the membership of individuals in a particular rsFC group (i.e., squared multiple regression R 2 ) was strong and highly significant for group 1 (R 2 = 52%, F = 79.42, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.11), group 3 (R 2 = 67%, F = 142.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE = 0.07), group 4 (R 2 = 35%, f = 51.2, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.17), and group 5 (R 2 = 46%, F = 7 l.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.14).

In multivariate analysis, a significant correlation between CRE acquisition and weeks of hospital stay was seen ( p < 0.001), however not with healthcare cost, the latter likely due to highly significant ( p < 0.00001) co-variation between healthcare cost and weeks of hospital stay.

Differences between recordings at 0.3, 0.7, 1.0, 1.3 and 1.7L/s were highly significant as revealed by Friedman test (p<0.00001).

However, when considering the combination of adding CBCL+BPRS, this yielded a strong increase in prediction accuracy that was highly significant compared to considering only the SIPS (MSE of SIPS=0.74±0.62, MSE of SIPS+BPRS+CBCL=0.716±0.59, p<0.00001) or separately adding BPRS (p<0.00001), or CBCL (p<0.00001) (see Figure 3C ).

This was in stark contrast to all our previous results where Levene’s test most often gave highly significant results ( P < 10 −5 ) and a quite tight posterior distribution.

Preoperatively this range averaged 2.8 mmHg (SD 2.4, MAX 14, MIN 0) which was decreased to 1.8 mmHg (SD 1.7, MAX 10, MIN 0) at month 12, a difference that was highly significant (P<0.00001).

A total of 90 highly significant QTL (245 SNPs; p < 10 −5 ) were identified for salinity-related traits with the strongest associations detected for root Na + content followed by root Na + :K + ( Fig 2A and 2B , respectively).

The overall effect was highly significant (Z = 7.70, p < 0.00001), further supporting the effectiveness of this dosage.

0.065), with highly significant differences (profanity Mann-Whitney U p < 10 − 5 , insult Mann-Whitney U p = 0.00034 ).

In six of the ten disorder/breed combinations (prcd-PRA, Labrador Retriever and Cocker Spaniel; PLL, Miniature Bull Terrier; EF, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel; PRA-rcd4, Gordon Setter and Irish Setter) there was a highly significant difference (P<0.1x10 -4 ) between the observed progeny hereditary genotype frequencies and those expected from random mating of parents (born t-2 to t-4 years) with known genotypes, providing unequivocal evidence of selection.

The Wald test and the likelihood ratio test were highly significant (P<0.00001 for both tests and for either model), and the pseudo-R 2 value and Hosmer and Lemeshow test confirmed the goodness-of-fit of both models.

Considering only INOCA patients, out of 38,987, only 195 (0.5%) experienced an adverse event related to ACh administration, while the incidence rate in the MINOCA population (34,319 pts) was 0.1%, configuring a highly significant difference among the two groups ( p < 0.00001). 4.

A highly significant sessional variation ( p < 0.00001) was pointed out.

To lend further support to the relationship between hepatic inflammation and TG levels in the liver, there were highly significant positive correlations between hepatic TG levels and TNFα (P < 0.00001), MCP1 (P = 0.0001), IL6 (P < 0.001) and IL1β (P < 0.00001) protein levels.

The proportion of individual habitats in hunting districts was statistically highly significant (Chi 2 with Yates = 361.92, df = 8, p <0.00001).

A total of 259 highly significant ( P ≤ 1 × 10 –5 ) marker-trait associations (MTAs) were identified for seven phenotypic traits.

In contrast, a highly significant increase in midbody-flanking Sept2 ( p -value < 0.00001) and a corresponding decrease in Sept2 at the central midbody ( p -value < 0.00001) were detected relative to the Jurkat CypA+/+ cells ( Figure 1 E).

For example, if one gene is repressed by 1.8-fold, the statistical significance may not be very high, but if all 78 cRPGs are repressed to a similar degree with an average of 1.8-fold, 1.8-fold becomes highly significant (P-value < 0.00001 when compared to background genes).

Correlation analysis showed a highly significant linear positive relationship (R 2 = 0.466; p < 0.00001) of plasmatic B4GALTs with age from infancy to centenarians (Figure 1A ).

The chi-squared goodness of fit test showed that 46.5% (1115) of the markers significantly differed from the expected 1:1 Francis to Rondo allele ratio at p < 0.05 and 7.6% (182) of the markers had highly significant segregation distortion at p < 1e−05.

However, the improvements in sleep were highly significant in Group A in the 2 nd week of drug intake ( P = 0.00001) [ Table 3 ].

Moreover, the fluorescence intensities standard deviations differences between the groups were highly significant (W = 56,296, p -value < 0.00001; Fig. 3 b).

The outcomes of the study outlined a statistically highly significant negative correlation between the level of education and drug use (Pearson test, R (38) = −0.9282; p < 0.00001).

SAD group had no difference in FVC improvement, but a highly significant difference for improved FEV 1 ( p < 0.00001) and improved FEF 25-75 ( p < 0.00001) in the SAD group. 5.

This outcome yielded a highly significant P value of <.00001, as shown in Figure 2 .