“highly significant”

See the problem here? In the Bond and DePaulo (2006) meta-analysis, the 54% accuracy was greater than chance with a highly significant ( p < 0.00001) t of nearly 40.

The results of the study concluded that HA alone or in combination with other materials was effective for the treatment of peri-implantitis, as the meta-analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference favouring the HA-treated group over the control group ( p = 0.00001).

Results Tone-matching performance As expected, SZ patients showed a highly significant, large effect-size deficit in the tone-matching task (TMT: z = −8.67 , P < 0.00001, d = 0.98) vs.

First, we found a highly significant effect of the experimental condition on the EMG amplitudes ( F [1.7, 464.5] = 162.77, P < .00001), with lower amplitudes for the 30-, 60-, and 120-ms prepulse + pulse conditions relative to the prepulse-alone condition (all P < .00001) across the study participants.

The presence of clustered breakpoints on a per-chromosome basis 13 : chromosomes that had a highly significant non-random distribution of breakpoints with a stringent threshold of P < 10 −5 were considered to be clustered.

Also, the presence of two or more risk factors resulted in a highly significant elevation of risk for severe vomiting (OR 15.97; 5.12–49.87; p < 0.00001) (The second table in Section 2.7 ).

The difference was highly significant (p < 0.00001).

Both tests had highly significant permutation p-values, with P < 10 −5 for the KS and Wilcoxon tests, indicating that GWAS SNPs were over-represented among SNPs with high core scores.

In regards to the restoration of a normal diet, 2 studies reported these data [ 3 , 40 ] and showed a highly significant difference between the FT and TC groups, in favor of the FT group (MD [CI 95%] = −1.87 [−2.30, −1.44]; P < 0.00001, I 2 = 1%, Fig. 5 B). 3.5.8 Morbidity and mortality rates All of the selected studies reported these outcomes.

Results : Analysis of spatial overlap between histo-PET and PSMA PET revealed highly significant correlations (p < 10 -5 ) in nine patients and moderate to high coefficients of determination (R2) from 42 to 82 % with an average of 60 ± 14 % in eight patients (in one patient R 2 = 7 %).

For Experiments I & II, we selected units with a split-half correlation of at least 0.1, where this correlation was highly significant (p< 10 −5 ).

For IL6 at the basal level the differences between S1L4 and N1L4 were highly significant (6.9-fold increase in N1L4; p < 0.00001).

Figure 7 a shows the relationship between LAI r and LAI-vc e by applying method (ii) with k r obtained by inverting Equation (7), which rendered highly significant statistical analysis ( Table 4 ) as expected ( R 2 = 0.94; b = 0.98; SEE = 0.71; RMSE = 0.15; p < 0.00001).

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium analysis for rs2904880 revealed highly significant deviation from expected genotype counts ( χ 2 = 161.4, df = 1, p < 0.00001), characterized by a marked heterozygote deficit (observed 271 [22.66%] vs. expected 428.36 [35.82%]) and a reciprocal homozygote excess.

The difference in attitude between MBBS and nursing students was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.00001), whereas the levels of knowledge ( P = 0.1359) and practice ( P = 0.9297) were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).

7c ), the VOPP1 / WWOX ratio was a highly significant variable ( p < 0.00001) with a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI 1.9–5.3).

The influence of institutional and personal profiles of farm households and experts on their attitudes towards wetland cultivation The chi-square results show that likelihood ratio statistics are highly significant (P < 00001), showing a strong explanatory power of the model.

Given that these numbers were drawn from genome-wide measurement of 20,722 genes, the enrichment on plasma cell signature genes is highly significant ( p < 10 − 5 , Fisher exact test).

As expected, different subphyla harbor very different sets of TEs, as revealed by a highly significant interaction between taxonomic group and TE family ( F 38,1103 = 7.43, P < 0.00001).

The tests are all highly significant, with p < 0.00001.

The differences were highly significant ( p < 0.00001) for both a 2 h treatment and an overnight treatment, suggesting that if we had used the earlier material in the second trial it could have proved more effective.

41 , 42 If these studies had been included, there would be a highly significant ( P < 0.00001) association between chemoprophylaxis and postoperative bleeding. 38 Moreover, a 2016 meta-analysis by Pannucci et al 43 found a higher risk of hematomas ( P = 0.02) in anticoagulated plastic surgery patients, in addition to no significant reduction in VTE risk in plastic surgery inpatients with Caprini scores >8.

The discriminant validity was demonstrated by highly significant differences ( p < 0.00001) between the treatment groups across multiple timepoints, with a strong effect size at three months.

The test for overall effect was highly significant (Z = 5.57, p < 0.00001), indicating a significant association between knowledge scores and experience across all categories.

Similarly, when anxiety was assessed using the SAS, CBT demonstrated a stronger and highly significant effect (MD = −6.22; 95% CI −7.63 to −4.80; P < 0.00001), also with no heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%).