= 0.0252) from the 198 unrelated individuals with ASD/ID (Table 1 ) which is a highly significant difference from European population frequencies from GnomAD ( p < 0.00001; OR = 30.6 with 95% CI 16.27 and 57.59).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The amplitude of the N1 component showed a highly significant color adaptation effect [ F (1, 13) = 71.6, P < 0.00001].
There was a strong relationship with sleep disturbance as indicated by highly significant correlations with all four SQS subscales (all p < 0.00001) but not with hours of sleep.
As expected from the voxel-wise analysis, all the regions of interest (AI, OP3, OP4, OP8, PIC, PIVC) show highly significant activations in the “Visual + vestibular” > “Visual only” contrast, with FDR adjusted p values < 10 −5 in all cases (Fig. 3 b).
For a test, we conducted chi 2 tests for some of the variables, but, as assumed, all results were highly significant (e.g., “gender”: chi 2 : 695303.9042, p < .00001).
3G was highly significant ( P < 10 − 5 , Fisher’s exact test).
A paired t-test comparing males and females showed a highly significant difference (t = -12.62, p < 0.00001), indicating that females consistently had higher values compared to males.
Statistical result interpretation The one-way ANOVA test revealed a highly significant difference in AgNPs size among the four extract concentrations (F = 98.48, p < 0.00001), indicating that nanoparticle size is strongly influenced by extract concentration.
There was a highly significant difference in composition by weighted UniFrac analysis ( p < 10 −5 ) (Fig. 3 b).
As demonstrated by the high odds ratio (log 2 (OR)>6) between all the data sets, we showed that there was a highly significant overlap in RI (Fisher’s exact adjusted p<1e−05, Figure 1—figure supplement 2a ).
While performance was similar among groups under nonaugmented feedback conditions [ F (2, 24) = 0.048; p = 0.95], a highly significant Group effect was obtained in the presence of augmented feedback [ F (2, 24) = 51.84; p ≤0.00001].
demonstrated that Nadi Shodhana Pranayama showed a significant decrease in auditory reaction time (ART) (p = 0.01), and Bhramari Pranayama showed a highly significant decrease in auditory reaction time (ART) (p < 0.00001).
A relatively small number of the correlations were strong ( R > 0.4) and highly significant ( p < 1e−5 and FDR < 0.016) (Fig. 4 a).
Expression of the four genes was correlated with highly significant correlation between PPARG, LPL and CD36 ( r > 0.9; P < 0.00001), and moderately significantly correlation with FABP4 ( r > 0.6, P < 0.001).
However, when we combined multiple studies of plasma t‐tau in our meta‐analysis, we observed a highly significant effect ( z = 4.69, p < 0.00001).
In contrast, a highly significant increase in midbody-flanking Sept2 ( p -value < 0.00001) and a corresponding decrease in Sept2 at the central midbody ( p -value < 0.00001) were detected relative to the Jurkat CypA+/+ cells ( Figure 1 E).
Peripheral calcifications showed highly significant differences between subtypes ( p < 0.00001).
The regression model ( Table 4 ) provided a highly significant fit for the Executive Function index; the proportion of variance explained was 0.6 (F = 19.8, p<0.00001).
As in the previous analysis the variable synchrony was highly significant [F(1,14) = 44.76, p = .00001], with stronger agreement after synchronous (7.10) than asynchronous training (2.99).
Despite the relatively low statistical power owing to the small sample number, if one assumes a normal distribution of the control values, the difference between the control and patient values is highly significant (SD >5, P =10e-6).
However, the highly significant differences in sputum conversion ( P <0.00001) corresponded to only slight differences in the conversion rates (86.6% vs. 84.3%).
The YAPS, BLSA, and ROS proteomic signatures, including 86, 254, and 244 significantly altered proteins, respectively, share 25 proteins, and this intersection, defined as the incipient AD proteomic signature, is highly significant (SuperExactTest, P < 0.00001).
Regression analysis revealed a highly significant relationship between 28S and 18S copy numbers ( R 2 = 0.996; P < 0.00001; Supplementary Fig. 1 in Supplementary File 3 ), with a regression coefficient close to the expected value of 1 (1.02).
( 2 ), was highly significant (likelihood ratio 799.7, DF = 6, p < 0.00001), and there was no evidence of lack of fit (likelihood ratio 10.7, DF = 177, p = 1), indicating that further interactions, or higher order interactions, between variables, were not substantial.
There is a highly significant correlation of the expression levels of individual ta-TRIM s as determined from EST and from RNA-Seq data (Pearson correlation test, P < 0.00001), confirming that the variation observed among ta-TRIM s is not an artifact of the mapping algorithm or the selected parameters.