Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 1 × 10 -50.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Single-marker FBAT analyses display only a non-significant trend in this direction, possibly due to small sample size, but confirm a highly significant divergence in allelic transmission probabilities between autistic patients and unaffected siblings at this locus (P < 1 × 10 -5 , table 5 ).
highly significantp=0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean hemoglobin concentration showed a highly significant statistical difference in relation to the type of complications in severe malaria (p=0.00001); it was lowest in those with severe anemia (3.5 g/dL), increasing to 8.2 g/dL in cases of renal failure, to 9 and 9.1 g/dL respectively in hepatitis cases and in prostrated patients, and up to 11.4 and 11.6 g/dL in cerebral malaria and algid malaria patients, respectively ( Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Seven other RSA traits were modified in both IL99 and Ruta reflecting the common response to LN (Figure 3a–g ) but showed a highly significant change in IL99 ( p < 0.00001) and lower significance in Ruta, including maximum number of roots*, number of root tips, total root length*, network area*, volume, surface area, and holes* (i.e., traits marked with* were advantageous in IL99 over Ruta under the LN treatment (Figure 3a–g ).
highly significantP < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interestingly, we found that the ASA difference between functionally critical and non-critical sites involved in catalytic or binding activity in our data set is not statistically significant ( P > 0.08), whereas the difference of dfi between these sites is highly significant with P < 0.00001 as also shown for residues located in loops ( Fig. 3 B).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
fairly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, Table 3 shows the multiple comparison using Dunn’s multiple comparison test with the results being fairly significant ( p < 0.001) for the Watch–Access pair, very highly significant ( p < 0.00001) for the Watch anti-TB without duplicates pair, and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for the Watch anti-TB (all) pair.