Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 5.5 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the association between rs9465922 and IS remained highly significant after adjusting for self-reported diabetes status in our population (OR = 0.55, 95% = 0.44–0.70, P = 5.5 × 10 −7 ), suggesting the effect of this gene on IS may be independent of the effect of T2D.
highly significantP = 5.6 × 10 − 70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As an example, the analysis of 514 kidney clear cell carcinomas (KIRC) with the 23 transcripts comprising the Pyrimidine Biosynthesis Pathway generated two distinct t-SNE clusters containing nearly identical tumor numbers and associated with highly significant median survival differences (2090 days vs. > 4500 days, P = 5.6 × 10 − 7 , Fig. 1 a and b and ref.
highly significantp-value = 6×10 –70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant (median p-value = 6×10 –7 ) pair-wise differences in molecular marker expression were observed for all markers ranging from mature, functional, and synaptic neuron markers to astrocyte, oligodendrocyte, and microglial markers ( Figure 1B ; Figure 1—figure supplements 4 and 5 ; Supplementary file 5 ) – confirming neuronal and non-neuronal cell-type identities in the NeuN + and NeuN - nuclei samples, respectively.
highly significantP -value <6 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The 52 targets with high cancer cytostatic scores contain 8 out of 24 known targets of the 14 FDA-approved metabolic anticancer drugs found in DrugBank ( Wishart et al, 2008 ) ( Supplementary Tables S1, S2 and S5 ), representing a highly significant enrichment (hypergeometric P -value <6 × 10 −7 ), testifying to predictive power of the model.
highly significantp = 6.0 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Categorization of subjects based on high systolic blood pressure (≥75th percentile) and low systolic blood pressure (≤25th percentile) generated a highly significant difference in slope of the principal component for CVD risk factors ( p = 6.0 × 10 −7 ), since individuals having high systolic blood pressure tended to have negative slopes (average = −0.37) while the group with low initial blood pressure did not show any change in slope (average = 0.01).
highly significantp = 6.2 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This effect was highly significant for both the ipsilaterally-tuned population ( t test, t (68) = 5.5, p = 6.2 × 10 −7 ) o and contralaterally-tuned population ( t test, t (162) = 7.15, p = 2.8 × 10 −11 ). p We found that attend in responses of contralateral neurons, but not ipsilateral neurons, were better described by a WTA model (a linear regression slope of 1 signifies a WTA response; Fig. 6 B ).