Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp -value = 3.755 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expression heterogeneity of CD63 was found to be highly significant on this cell trajectory ( p -value = 3.755 × 10 −7 , Supplemental Table S3 ) and defined a green trajectory cluster ( Figure 6 D) comprising markers like cluster of differentiation 52 (CD52), heat shock protein family B (small) member 1 (HSPB1), Meis homeobox 1 (MEIS1), Pim-2 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (PIM2), RAD52 homolog, and DNA repair protein (RAD52) following CD63 expression ( Figure 6 E).
highly significantp=3.85×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The waist circumference was higher per minor allele in never-smokers: +0.23% (95% CI 0.09% to 0.36%; p=0.0012), non-significantly related in former smokers −0.07% (95% CI −0.24% to 0.09%; p=0.37) and lower in current smokers −0.40% (95% CI −0.57 to −0.22 p=1.69×10 −5 ): differences among smoking groups were highly significant (p=3.85×10 −7 ; see online supplementary figure S2.
highly significantP = 4.01 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Remarkably, we observed highly significant association between the methylation state at cg18181703 and the MetS status in our large cohort ( P = 4.01 × 10 −7 ) ( Table 3 ), suggesting the epigenetic status at this site of gene SOCS3 is strongly inversely associated with the presence of MetS.
highly significantp = 4.5 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast, the 100-gene PDCD4 signature demonstrated highly significant prognostic value (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.75, p = 4.5 × 10 −7 , C-index = 0.621; Supplementary Figure S3 ), with significantly superior discriminative ability (likelihood ratio test p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).
highly significantP = 4.58 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
An analysis of gene expression considering all genes and DGRP lines revealed a highly significant five-way interaction among injury, diet, age, gene, and line (ANOVA, F 144,2736 = 1.72, P = 4.58 × 10 −7 ), with interaction meaning that the effect of one factor on gene expression depends on the level(s) or one or more other factors.
highly significantP =4.8 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Cross-correlations, in SDI_local, between the two populations were positive at all 22 chromosomes considered (range in r =0.05–0.999; median r =0.668; Supplementary Table 1 ). A sign test on all 22 correlations being positive is highly significant ( P =4.8 × 10 −7 , assuming a null expectation of a correlation being equally likely to be positive or negative).
highly significantP = 4.8e-070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Wilcoxon rank-test between TP datasets (Arabidopsis and non-Arabidopsis) were not observed to be significant while Wilcoxon rank test between non-Arabidopsis FN and TP datasets were observed to be highly significant (Wilcoxon rank test P = 4.8e-07 for Arabidopsis and for non-Arabidopsis datasets).