“highly significant”

In contrast, the difference between double conditions was large and highly significant (D + : median 1.27, D − : median: 0.63, z = 7.1481, Bonferroni corrected p < 10 −11 , Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

The usual care plus albendazole arm continued, however, to show a highly significant difference in weight gain (2.8 [SE 0.1] kg vs. 3.8 [SE 0.1] kg, difference 1.0 [SE 0.15] kg, p = 10 −11 ), with the dewormed children exhibiting a 35 (SE 5) % higher weight gain.

The enrichment of functionally characterized sites within the group of AcP-insensitive sites is highly significant ( P = 1e-11, Fisher exact test).” The authors apologize for these errors and for any inconvenience caused.

Expanding the observation to cells that showed morphological changes, including elongation, that preceded divisions, another 87 cells appeared to be preparing for division in aggregates while none of the isolated cells showed any shape change, which was a highly significant difference (24.3% vs 0%, two-sided p< 10 - 11).

A generalized linear regression model with output SRT benefit modeled just from avREOIG (i.e., SRT benefit ∼ 1+ avREOIG) showed both intercept ( p < 10 −22 ) and avREOIG ( p < 10 −11 ) to be highly significant factors with an overall r 2 = 0.371 ( p < 10 −11 ), that is, 37.1% explained variance.

The difference between slender and bulky populations that were not reshaped remained highly significant ( P < 10 −11 , Wilcoxon rank sum).

When we examine spontaneous avoiding reactions of freely swimming paramecia, we find that both backward swimming duration and reorientation angle vary broadly (156 ± 81 ms and 114 ± 66°, respectively) ( Fig 9H ), and there is a small although highly significant correlation (linear regression, r = 0.2, p = 10 −11 ).

The most unexpected effect of Inosine showed highly significant increased expression of proteins in complement cascade (c1qa, c1qB, c1qy, c1, c2, c3, c4B, adipsin) with p < 10 -11 [ 50 ].

In Mp toc1 ko mutants, expression of Mp PRR was continuously high and arrhythmic, as indicated by highly significant effects of both genotype (G) and genotype x time interaction (GxT) terms in ANOVA ( P < 10 −11 ), suggesting that MpTOC1 represses Mp PRR .

The regression for the dress explained 9.2% of the variance and was highly significant (F(2497) = 25.0, p = 10 −11 ).

Specifically, for ROC-AUC, the differences were highly significant versus ChemBERTa ( t = 11.99, p < 1 × 10 −11 ) and CLAMP ( t = 10.23, p < 1 × 10 −10 ).

The effect of set size was also highly significant [ F (2,54) = 73.84, p < 10 -11 , η p 2 = 0.73], showing that the Mooney face targets were not searched efficiently.

Permutation testing reveals that skewing in the 19p region is highly significant (p<10 −11 ).

The overall differences between the incidences of the tested neuronal markers among the virus delivered eGFP expressing neurons were highly significant, the Kruskal Wallis H test between groups: Hdf = 61.2, p < 1e − 11.

The overlap of these 952 AI genes with the 223 core breast ER- signature (Figure 1 ) was 51; by chance, around 19 genes would have been expected to overlap, which makes the observed overlap of 51 highly significant ( p = 1E-11, one-sided Fisher's exact).

The PWM score changes are highly significant between activating and repressing variants (one-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, p -value < 10 −11 ).

Moreover, enrichment of ChIP-Seq peak counts at both motifs was highly significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum: p<1×10 −11 ).

Highly significant differences were observed in the level of clustering, or transitivity ( F = 86, p = 10 −11 ), however, with the antigens showing strong clusters separated from each other.

2, A and B ), which is not considered a statistically significant increase (P = 0.8) but is highly significant when compared with spontaneous breaks in WT and 53BP1 KO cells (P = 1.01 × 10 −11 for WT and P = 0.00016 for 53BP1 KO).

Independent-samples t-test revealed that MD patients ( n = 31) displayed significantly higher Delta_TP_C-B values (Mean = 0.383, SD = 0.104) compared to SV patients ( n = 19; Mean = 0.162, SD = 0.040), yielding a highly significant difference ( t = 8.89, p = 1.04 × 10 −11 ).

Differences were highly significant ( p < 1.05e-11, OR = 7.67; Fig. 2 C).

The positive association between San ancestry and TB susceptibility was highly significant, whereas association with Bantu ancestry was relatively weak (p-value =1.06×10 -11 and p-value =3.00×10 -2 respectively) [ 8 ].

Overall between-group differences were highly significant ( p = 1.113 × 10 −11 ; p _adjust = 2.226 × 10 −11 ) ( Figure 2 A).

1 E), including a highly significant increase in the abundance of Staphylococcus genus after transplant (Fig. 1 E, ANCOM-BC, p = 1.2 −11 ).

Formal meta-analysis of the replication cohorts was highly significant (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 3.2-8.5, P = 1.2 × 10 −11 ).