Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 7.66 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Individual MMR Gene and Combined dMMR Survival Analysis A six-group log-rank analysis comparing MLH1 -mutant ( n = 18; 2 events, 11%), MSH2 -mutant ( n = 27; 1 event, 4%), MSH6 -mutant ( n = 46; 6 events, 13%), PMS2 -mutant ( n = 12; 1 event, 8%), POLE -mutant ( n = 63; 4 events, 6%), and TP53 -mutant ( n = 880; 373 events, 42%) subgroups demonstrated highly significant OS differences (log-rank p = 7.66 × 10 −12 ; Table 2 , Figure 3 ).
highly significantp = 8 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A paired t test on measurements at 0.8 and 2.0 m above the ground for all PDT deployments less than 5 m from the kerbside (a working definition of ‘roadside’ for local air quality assessment (Defra 2009 )) demonstrated highly significant evidence for a difference in NO 2 concentration between the two heights ( p = 8 × 10 −12 , n = 84, Table 1 ).
highly significantP = 9 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although highly significant (one-sided Pearson P = 9 × 10 −12 for RSA and P = 2 × 10 −4 for DTL), the magnitude that ns-polymorphism distributions shift with respect to DTL and RSA was subtle: Across samples, the mean DTL of ns-polymorphism varied by less than 1 Å, and the mean RSA varied between 0.34 and 0.38.
highly significantp = 9.04 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interaction of the proteins from the protein-coding genes seen in Figure S2 revealed a highly significant network ( p = 9.04 × 10 −12 ) with 76 connections, an average node degree of 2.53, an average local clustering coefficient of 0.382, and a maximum interaction score of 0.50.
highly significantp < 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A generalized linear regression model with output SRT benefit modeled just from avREOIG (i.e., SRT benefit ∼ 1+ avREOIG) showed both intercept ( p < 10 −22 ) and avREOIG ( p < 10 −11 ) to be highly significant factors with an overall r 2 = 0.371 ( p < 10 −11 ), that is, 37.1% explained variance.
highly significantp < 10 -110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effect of set size was also highly significant [ F (2,54) = 73.84, p < 10 -11 , η p 2 = 0.73], showing that the Mooney face targets were not searched efficiently.
Visual Search of Mooney Faces.
Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC4751287