Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP =5.11 × 10 −150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant association between childhood emotional abuse and NR3C1 methylation ( b =1.06; P =5.11 × 10 −15 ) showing that emotionally abused subjects had higher methylation status (0.135 (s.d.=0.03)) than non-emotionally abused subjects (0.098 (s.d.=0.03); Supplementary Figure S1 ).
highly significantP =5.16×10 −150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Double-labelling with antibodies to Smo and to acetylated tubulin (which marks stable microtubules found in cilia) revealed a highly significant accumulation of Smo in the cilia of NIH-3T3 cells upon addition of ShhN ( Fig. 6 B,G; χ 2 =61.19, d.f.=1, n =157 cells, P =5.16×10 −15 ) whereas, in the absence of ShhN, cilia are largely devoid of Smo ( Fig. 6 A,G) ( Rohatgi et al., 2007 ).
highly significantp = 6.4 × 10 −150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found that the sep-1(ts) mutant grown at permissive temperature showed a highly significant reduction in the number of apoptotic corpses (average of 2.4 ± 1.2 corpses; n = 53; p = 6.4 × 10 −15 ) at the “comma” stage of embryogenesis compared to that in wild type (N2) embryos (average of 4.4 ± 1.2; n = 121; Fig. 1B ).
highly significantP = 8.98e -150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
First, as previously reported for various eukaryotes [ 63 , 64 ] most introns were inserted in phase 0 (40.2% of all introns) or phase 1 (38%), with a highly significant underrepresentation of intron insertions in phase 2 (21.8%; c 2 = 64.68, P = 8.98e -15 ; Figure 2a ).
highly significantp = 9*10 −150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Inversely, a statistically highly significant DEHP-induced decreased reads numbers (p = 9*10 −15 ) was observed in Tmem125 promoter region in MBDseq experiment in C57BL/6J controls (19.8±3.9) compared with DEHP300 (0.9±3.9%), ( Fig 5B ), consistent with a DEHP-induced decreased methylation levels recorded in pyrosequencing experiment in CpG 1 although not statistically significant (p = 0.7) in C57BL/6J controls (69±4%) compared to DEHP300 (65±10%), ( Fig 5C ).
highly significantp < 1e −140.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The overlap (25%, 57 genes) between the S2 cell screen (227 genes identified; Table S6 ) and our genome-wide study on Kc 167 cells (526 genes identified) was highly significant ( p < 1e −14 , Wilcox test).
highly significantp < 1 × 10 −140.0× alphaqualifiedgold
PERMDISP analyses revealed significant within‐group variability at both class and ASV levels (bacteria: F = 8.98, p < 0.001; fungi: F = 7.59, p = 0.014; bacterial ASVs: F = 67.93, p = 0.000; fungal ASVs: F = 10.12, p < 0.001), while posthoc PERMANOVA confirmed highly significant temporal shifts, particularly in fungal classes and ASVs ( p < 1 × 10 −14 ) (Tables S2 and S3 ).
highly significantP <1×10 −140.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These contrasting trajectories were supported by statistical analyses: in cluster 1, differences between batches emerged as early as 2 hpi and remained highly significant thereafter ( P <1×10 −14 at 24 hpi); in cluster 2, divergence became significant from 8 hpi onward, with very big differences at 18 hpi and 24 hpi ( P <1×10 −10 and P <1×10 −65 , respectively); and in cluster 3, batches remained comparable until a pronounced difference appeared at 24 hpi ( P <1×10 −10 ) ( Fig. 4 ).