“highly significant”

concluded that lipid layer anomaly dry eye was the most prevalent type of dry eye in their study.[ 10 ] A study mentioned that the prevalence of dry eye was 95% in patients with blocked meibomian glands.[ 13 ] This occurrence of MGD in dry eye is statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000) in our study.

This indicated an increase in students’ understanding and awareness after the lecture and simulation training with a highly significant improvement (P=0.000).The highest mean score regarding evacuation disaster simulation competencies performance and total scores at pre- and post-educational intervention (Time (3.73), Process (3.13), and Transportation (4.12).

The model explains approximately 22.58 per cent of the variance in intrinsic motivation with a highly significant F value of 43.15 ( p < 0.000).

The developed model is highly significant ( P = 0.000) and acceptable, showing that pH was the highest significant factor influencing the bioprocess.

Concentration has a highly significant impact ( p = 0.0000), while cultivars also show a significant effect ( p = 0.0442).

According to BMI groups a highly significant difference in many patient satisfaction domains were found (P< 0.000).

In our study, this relationship was statistically confirmed, with a highly significant association between obturation density and the presence of periapical lesions ( p = 0.000), supporting existing literature.

It is worth noting that the difference with the control group was highly significant with combo ( p = 0.000) (Fig. 2 C, Supplementary Table S3 ).

In the full cohort of HCC patients, preoperative CTC ≥ 2 had marginally significant association with increased tumor number (P = 0.067) and higher Edmonson grade (P = 0.064), while it had highly significant association with increased tumor size (P = 0.000), presence of PVTT (P = 0.000), and consequently higher BCLC stage (P = 0.000).

Though the difference at rest was highly significant ( p = 0.000), the difference at effort was not far from being not significant ( p = 0.049).

morrilli populations Exact tests (simultaneous analysis) for population differentiation indicated that highly significant differences in marker frequencies existed among the G. morrilli populations ( χ 2 = 400.8; df = 50; P = 0.0000) (Table 1) .

That distinction was emphasized by pairwise examination between approaches; the difference between Retinal and Thalamic distributions not rising to significance, but both comparisons with the Cortical distribution were highly significant (ANOVA, F 2, 101 = 9.3, p = 0.000; p R-T = 0.8, p R-C = 0.000, p T-C = 0.003; Fig. 2 i).

All the correlations are observed to be highly significant (p = 0.000).

On follow up, raised mean MVD was seen in those cases with relapse/deceased as compared to disease-free patients, which was highly significant (p = 0.000).

The w/b ratio has a highly significant effect ( p = 0.000, F = 24.02) and explains a large portion of the total variation.

A highly significant association was found with place of residence ( p = .000), and a significant association was found with age ( p = .050).

Group comparison was done using Anova and the results showed a very highly significant difference between the caries-affected dentin and the normal dentin ( P < 0.000).

To further identify highly significant DEGs, stricter thresholds were applied (|log 2 FC| ≥ 4 and P-value ≈ 0).

Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (190) = 2386; p = 0.00).

After applying the first difference, all variables display strong evidence of stationarity, with all four test statistics highly significant ( p -values = 0.00). 4.2.

intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).

There was a highly significant difference in myrmecophilous pollination among the ant subfamilies for different plant species (χ2 = 2.475; df = 3; p = 0.000) ( Figure 2 ).

Bivariate analysis revealed a highly significant positive correlation between ceftriaxone and gentamicin (ρ = 1.000; p = 0.000).

Specifically, the pooled SMD indicated a highly significant increase in iron in the PUT (SMD = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.84, p = 0.00, I 2 = 87.24%, k = 8, n = 208) ( Figure 3 ), nearly high increases in the GP (SMD = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.52, p = 0.03, I 2 = 88.88%, k = 6, n = 155) ( Figure 4 ), and moderate increases in the CN (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.39 to 1.06, p = 0.00, I 2 = 47.22%, k = 6, n = 152) ( Figure 5 ).

The difference in scores was highly significant according to the Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.000).