“highly significant”

Because the investigated variables were not normally distributed (all p -values were highly significant using the Shapiro–Wilk test: study duration ( p < 0.000), study phases ( p < 0.000)), we employed correlation analysis according to Spearman.

For the branch models (Table 2 ), the H 1 hypothesis (H 0 as null) was found to be highly significant (H 0 –H 1 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .000), while the H 2 model (H 0 as null) was not supported (H 0 –H 2 , df = 1, χ 2 p ‐value = .142).

Significant differences were also observed across multiple subscales, with a highly significant difference in sleep duration between the JIA group and the control group ( p = 0.000), as well as significant differences in sleep anxiety ( p = 0.046), night awakenings ( p = 0.002), abnormal sleep patterns ( p = 0.003), sleep breathing disorders ( p = 0.000), and daytime sleepiness ( p = 0.007).

The mean difference of -1.933 was highly significant (p=0.000).

The model explains approximately 22.58 per cent of the variance in intrinsic motivation with a highly significant F value of 43.15 ( p < 0.000).

For the Filtek Z350 XT, the ANOVA test showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000) in Δa values at different time intervals (i.e., Δa1, Δa2, Δa3, Δa4, Δa5) between the combined groups.

The student’s knowledge and awareness on cancer education scores were highly significant ( p = 0.000).

The correlation between the two SIPRe samples (junior and expert therapists) was highly significant (Spearman’s rho=0.936; p<000).

The results revealed a highly significant positive association (p = 0.000) with χ 2 (1, N = 453) = 90.644.

Comparison of solubility- effect of different solvents on gutta-percha and resilon at 2-minute immersion time interval [ Figure 2a ] showed that there was a very highly significant difference in the amount of gutta-percha and resilon dissolved in all the solvents ( P =0.00) except the distilled water (Control) groups ( P >0.05).

The developed model is highly significant ( P = 0.000) and acceptable, showing that pH was the highest significant factor influencing the bioprocess.

Another highly significant finding involves the association between stress-related eating behaviors and depression-related eating urges [ χ 2 =50.515, df = 2, P = 0.000], which is shown in the results as the vast majority [89.9%] of respondents who do not eat when stressed reported no urge to eat more when feeling down.

Results The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed that there was a highly significant time effect on participant’s Insulin level (F (1.8, 53.6) = 10.64, P < 0 0.000, ηp 2 = 0.269).

The direct effect of multiple educational technology platforms on student well-being is negative and highly significant (β = − 0.234, SE = 0.029, Z = − 8.19, p =.000), showing that multiple educational technology platforms enormously diminish student well-being; see Table 5 .

There was highly significant association between duration of operation and management options, p=.000.

ANOVA has also established a highly significant association between low anti-HBs titre (<10 mIU/mL) and the reported autoimmune disease (p=0.000) and cancer (p=0.015).

The rootstock was highly significant ( P = 0.00), confirming that resistance levels were dependent on genotype.

intermedia , which was present in 83.3% (20/24) of the patients in comparison with 25% (6/24) in the control group for a highly significant difference ( p = 0.000).

The highly significant regression model for CoF (model F = 19.74, P = 0.000) confirms that frictional variability is driven by filler, load, distance, and emery paper.

A highly significant difference was observed in d -dimer, CRP, sedimentation levels across groups ( P = .000, P = .000, P = .01) ( Table 4 , Figure 1 ).

Knowing someone with OA emerged as a highly significant predictor, making participants over 10 times more likely to have high knowledge (Exp(B) = 10.217, p = 0.000).

This difference was highly significant (X 2 =24.85, N=47 P<0.0000).

Figure 1 indicates that instillation with Pseudomonas results in a small but highly significant increase in bronchial secretion score in the treated segments at day 3 following instillation (d0: 1 [1] – [2] and d3: 1.5 [1] – [3] ; p = 0.000, Wilcoxon signed rank test).

A strong, highly significant positive linear correlation was observed between VV M1 × VV M4 (r = 0.8712; p = 0.0000; Figure 4 A) and between VV M2 × TT M1 (r = 0.834; p = 0.0002; Figure 4 B).

These associations were stronger when the IOS parameters were obtained in the supine position, and a highly significant association was found between X5 and RDI ( r = −0.517, P = 0.000).