Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell short of significance”

362 sentences · 362 papers · 438 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

fell short of significancep = 0.2715.4× alphagold
actinomycetemcomitans bacteria counts showed a tendency to decrease, but this difference fell short of significance between the probiotic-treated and the control groups (SMD: −0.16; 95% CI: −0.45–0.13; p = 0.271) with no significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.650).
fell short of significancep = 0.387.6× alphagold
Specifically, socially enriched IN-OT treated subjects showed significantly greater OTR density in the LS socially enriched saline treated subjects (LS mean difference = 1134.0; p = 0.02), whereas the post hoc difference between socially limited IN-OT treated subjects and socially limited saline treated subjects fell short of significance (LS mean difference = 370.7; p = 0.38).
fell short of significancep = 0.448.8× alphagold
In terms of AMRT, the cohorts with 2 and 3 osteoarthritic body sites statistically differ from that with no arthritis or with one body site affected by OA, while the differences between “OA in 2 body sites” and “OA in 3 body sites” as wells as “no arthritis” and “one body site osteoarthritis” fell short of significance (p = 0.44 for “OA in 2 body sites” vs. “OA in 3 body sites”; p = 0.29 for “no OA” vs “OA in 1 body site”, p = 6.4 × 10 −8 for “no OA” vs “OA in 3 body sites”, p = 1 × 10 −5 for “OA in 1 body site” vs “OA in 3 body sites”, p = 2.7 × 10 −7 for “no OA” vs “OA in 2 body sites”, Fig. 5C ).
In contrast to the conditional responses for both groups shown in Figure 2 , the diabetic rats had lost the initial C 1 mBP pressor response at this later phase in the development of diabetic pathophysiology (upper left insert, Figure 5 ), though, given the small “ n ” for the BB animals, this between group difference fell short of significance (CS+: F 1,18 = 3.97; CS−: F 1,18 = 1.49).
However, analyses did show that for those with more history of childhood trauma, MBCT made a significant difference: The hazard ratio of relapse for patients receiving MBCT was 0.43 relative to those receiving TAU alone, though in this model, the contrast between MBCT and CPE fell short of significance (see below).