Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell short of significance”

362 sentences · 362 papers · 438 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

fell short of significanceP = 0.122.4× alphagold
A 2 × 2 ANOVA of reaction times with factors rhyming (rhyming, nonrhyming) and spelling (congruent, incongruent) did indeed reveal an interaction in the predicted direction, with relatively faster responses for rhyme trials sharing spellings and relatively slower responses for nonrhyme trials with similar spellings, but this effect fell short of significance ( F 1,11 = 2.92, P = 0.12).
fell short of significancep = 0.132.6× alphagold
The difference in weight loss fell short of significance (intervention group −3.7 kg, SD = 5.2 vs control group −1.9 kg, SD = 6.7; F(1,108) = 2.3, p = 0.13), although when adjusted for co-interventions (i.e., medical treatment) and incident morbidities that might affect weight, the difference was significant (M Difference 2.9 kg, 95% CI: −5.1 to −0.6, p = 0.014).
fell short of significancep = 0.153.0× alphagold
Meanness and Disinhibition ratings each significantly predicted self‐reported Meanness when evaluated individually ( β M = 0.18 and β D = 0.15, p s < 0.05), but when included together along with boldness in the joint regression model, the beta coefficient for informant‐rated Meanness fell short of significance ( β T = 0.14, p = 0.15) and the coefficient for Disinhibition was clearly nonsignificant ( β T = 0.07, p = 0.43)—indicating that variance shared between the two traits contributed to the independent beta coefficients for each.