“extremely significant”

**** indicates extremely significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001).

Analysis of variance and statistical test results showed that the model P-value was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

However, extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were observed between the presence and absence of Mn 2+ .

Comparison of the Puncture Depth Between the Ipsilateral Ventricle and the Contralateral Ventricle The difference in the puncture depth between the ipsilateral ventricle and the contralateral ventricle was extremely significant ( P < .0001); the depth of puncture to the ipsilateral ventricle in 373 patients was less than 60 mm, and the depth of puncture to the contralateral ventricle in 37 patients ranged from 52 to 65 mm (Figure 4 D).

The simulation group showed an extremely significant (two-tailed p < 0.0001) improvement in their post-test scores when compared to their scores before the module was taught.

For plipastatins, this effect compared with that of the control without lipopeptide was statistically significant ( p = 0.0023, using the Dunn's multiple comparison test) for 300 mg.L −1 of the sample and extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) for the higher concentration (500 mg.L −1 ) of plipastatins.

The distribution of the clade specific patterns was extremely significant associated with the tree topology and geographic location of the strains. ∗∗∗ = ( p < 0.0001).

The interaction of the two factors was extremely significant ( p < .0001) in reducing tumor size ( Figure 4(A) ).

Except for the AD vaccine group, the serum from all the recombinant ADDomer-VLP vaccine groups exhibited extremely significant differences ( P <0.0001) in ND50 on day 35 compared to day 0.

It can be seen from Table A3 that the quadratic polynomial fit model is extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

The analysis of variance of the response surface revealed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the correlation coefficient R 2 was 0.9816, and the adjusted determination coefficients R adj 2 was 0.9632 ( Table 2 ).

Linear regression of wound healing profiles altogether showed that the differences between the elevations or intercepts (i.e., X -intercept when Y = 0.0 and thus closure time) were extremely significant between the stimulated samples at 1 Hz and 80 Hz and the control specimens ( p < 0.0001).

Nonparametric ANOVA was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA analysis showed an extremely significant drug effect ( F (4, 329) = 8.571, p < 0.0001) and time effect ( F (4, 329) = 8.571, p < 0.0001).

As shown in Figure 2 A and summarized in Table S1 , the type of LAB fermentation had an extremely significant and substantial impact on the soluble sugar content of the QJ beverage ( p < 0.0001), decreasing from 28.75 ± 0.12 to 26.11 ± 0.80, 21.61 ± 1.25, and 22.13 ± 1.32 mg/mL by the fermentation using the Lf14, Lr18 and Lp808 strains, respectively.

Statistical significance for studies involving two groups were determined by Student’s unpaired t -test whereas statistical significance for studies involving more than two factors were determined by Two-way ANOVA where ns indicated not significant, *indicates p < 0.05 and considered statistically significant, **indicates p < 0.01 and considered very significant, ***indicates p < 0.001 and considered extremely significant and ****indicates p < 0.0001 and considered extremely significant.

If hatch rates were compared between 23 weeks of conventional storage and 22 weeks (5 months) of water storage, differences were extremely significant for both species: 0.1 ± 0.1 versus 84.9 ± 9.8 %, respectively, for Ae. albopictus ( T test, t = 14.9589, df = 4, P < 0.0001) and 3.7 ± 1.2 versus 84.3 ± 4.0 %, respectively, for Ae. aegypti ( T test, t = 33.6313, df = 4, P < 0.0001).

137 A comparison of the in vitro release profiles of transferosome gels prepared using Polyoxyl 40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil and Span 60 surfactants revealed an extremely significant variation (p < 0.0001) in the curcumin release percentage after 6 and 48 h ( Figure 8B ).

Moreover, the observed extremely significant difference (p = 0.0001) showed the gap between generations and the decline of indigenous knowledge on medicinal plants down generations.

An anova analysis of those differences (Figure S1c ) found them not significant for the factor observer (person performing the WR phenotyping, P = 0.65) and the interaction between the observer and genotype factors ( P = 0.98) but extremely significant for the factor genotype ( P < 0.0001), as expected based on the CD1–CD8 experimental series.

A Student t-test showed extremely significant differences between both surfaces ( p < 0.0001; see Figure 7 B), which allows us to conclude that Tz-BSA-coated plates combined with modified-TCO capture antibody greatly improve the ELISA sensitivity. 4.

For RTs, the repeated measures ANOVA exhibited a significant main effect of the session ( F 2.093, 50.229 = 3.577, p = 0.033, ηp2 = 0.13) and extremely significant effect of the condition ( F 1.284, 30.822 = 59.591, p < 0.0001, ηp2 = 0.713).

This statistically significant difference was during the entire follow-up 90 days, and from day 14 to day 42, in particular, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

Overall, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

We also detected an extremely significant correlation between N-glycan multiplicity and N-glycopeptide levels ( Figure 4B , Mann-Whitney test, p-value<0.0001).