“extremely significant”

Analysis of variance and statistical test results showed that the model P-value was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

However, extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were observed between the presence and absence of Mn 2+ .

The simulation group showed an extremely significant (two-tailed p < 0.0001) improvement in their post-test scores when compared to their scores before the module was taught.

Twelve overlapping cases with both same-sex attraction and maternal thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy were identified, which was extremely significant (P<0.0001, by Fisher’s exact test).

As shown in Figure 2 A and summarized in Table S1 , the type of LAB fermentation had an extremely significant and substantial impact on the soluble sugar content of the QJ beverage ( p < 0.0001), decreasing from 28.75 ± 0.12 to 26.11 ± 0.80, 21.61 ± 1.25, and 22.13 ± 1.32 mg/mL by the fermentation using the Lf14, Lr18 and Lp808 strains, respectively.

The analysis of variance of the response surface revealed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the correlation coefficient R 2 was 0.9816, and the adjusted determination coefficients R adj 2 was 0.9632 ( Table 2 ).

Nonparametric ANOVA was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).

5E ), survival curves for the WT and Δ BbOle1 mutant strains were extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), and the LT 50 values for these two strains were 6 and 8 days, respectively.

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA analysis showed an extremely significant drug effect ( F (4, 329) = 8.571, p < 0.0001) and time effect ( F (4, 329) = 8.571, p < 0.0001).

Linear regression of wound healing profiles altogether showed that the differences between the elevations or intercepts (i.e., X -intercept when Y = 0.0 and thus closure time) were extremely significant between the stimulated samples at 1 Hz and 80 Hz and the control specimens ( p < 0.0001).

The fitted model was extremely significant ( F = 61.47 and p < 0.0001).

Sea cucumbers treated with AjKiss1b-10 for 40 days exhibited weight loss (p=0.0583, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, as shown in Figure 7E ) and extremely significant intestinal degeneration (p=0.0001, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, as shown in Figure 7F,G ), which are characteristic phenotypes of aestivating A. japonicus ( Wang et al., 2015 ).

In this test, it was observed that treatment had an extremely significant effect on the ability of the mice to recognize the novel object ( p <0.0001).

An unpaired t test (for two-groups comparison) and ANOVA test (for multi-group comparison) were used in statistical analysis ( ∗ , p < 0.05, significant; ∗∗ , p < 0.01, very significant; ∗∗∗ , p < 0.001, highly significant; ∗∗∗∗ , p < 0.0001, extremely significant; ns, p > 0.05, not significant).

The mathematical models of Pb 2+ and Cd 2+ were extremely significant (p < 0.0001), and the determination coefficients were 0.9952 and 0.9887, respectively, indicating that these two models can explain of the change of response values, and provided a perfect fit of response surface.

Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), very significant when p < 0.01 (**), highly significant when p < 0.0002 (***), and extremely significant when p < 0.0001 (****).

A Student t-test showed extremely significant differences between both surfaces ( p < 0.0001; see Figure 7 B), which allows us to conclude that Tz-BSA-coated plates combined with modified-TCO capture antibody greatly improve the ELISA sensitivity. 4.

A considerable elevation in the expression levels of all assessed markers—TNF-alpha, IL-1β, c-Fos, BDNF, Nfl, and GFP—was noted in the ISO-induced group, exhibiting extremely significant differences relative to the control group ( p < 0.0001).

Using the permutation-based recombination breakpoint-clustering test employed in [63] , we detected an extremely significant association (p<0.0001) between breakpoint positions and the locations of the primer binding sites used to sequence these genomes.

The distance between channels have extremely significant difference between white-red (p = 0.0001), highly significant between blue-green (p = 0.0127), blue-red (p = 0.002), green-red (p = 0.0014) but no significant difference comparing white-blue (p = 0.15), white-green (0.14).

Data Analysis The statistical significance of correlation analyses was assessed using linear correlation tests: not significant (N.S., p > 0.05), significant (*: 0.01 ≤ p ≤ 0.001), very significant (**: 0.001 ≤ p < 0.0001), extremely significant (***: p ≤ 0.0001).

Parenthesis and asterisks represent significant ( p = 0.01–0.05 (*)), very significant ( p = 0.001–0.01 (**)) and extremely significant ( p = 0.0001–0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****)) statistical differences.

As displayed in Figure 9(c) , the plotted KM curve illustrated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.0001), of these, 269 and 270 samples were classified into the high- and low-risk groupings, respectively. 3.8.

Among them, G exhibited an extremely significant effect on the angle of repose ( p < 0.0001), whereas F and J showed significant effects ( p = 0.0279 and 0.0155, respectively).

Statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-test on a pairwise comparison of the profile of the unfertilized oocyte with mRNA profiles collected at different time points after fertilization revealed that the correlation between segment and mRNA level is extremely significant ( P < 0.0001), but that there is no effect of fertilization and time following fertilization ( P ≈ 1).